Engine thrust washer failure
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Purely for interest has anyone else suffered total thrust washer failure?
For a couple of years I had a curious clutch problem when manoeuvering; it would clear first time but if slight engagement was made it wouldn't clear again so I often had to switch off and restart. Then a piston broke up and I was into a full reline/rebore. The previous total strip was at 170,000 and we were now at 240,000.
Removing the sump I found one of the crank thrust washers in the oil residue! Removing the crank showed the other one was badly scored and, worse, so was the crankshaft face.
I wanted to keep the crankshaft, as it was otherwise in excellent original condition, and eventually found Jim Stokes near Waterlooville who pointed me at a firm in Havant. They filled the scored area with matching metal (they were aerospace approved) and Stoke's reground the face to my dimension. Jim personally gave me some Plastigauage to measure the big end gaps and just one was 0.0003" out of spec as were the rear main bearing and one other, so no reground worth doing. Total cost in 2007 was ?350 just to repair the crank. Sorry, photos too large to display. Five years and 257,000 on the clock and everything there fine.
Anyone else had a problem in this area?
For a couple of years I had a curious clutch problem when manoeuvering; it would clear first time but if slight engagement was made it wouldn't clear again so I often had to switch off and restart. Then a piston broke up and I was into a full reline/rebore. The previous total strip was at 170,000 and we were now at 240,000.
Removing the sump I found one of the crank thrust washers in the oil residue! Removing the crank showed the other one was badly scored and, worse, so was the crankshaft face.
I wanted to keep the crankshaft, as it was otherwise in excellent original condition, and eventually found Jim Stokes near Waterlooville who pointed me at a firm in Havant. They filled the scored area with matching metal (they were aerospace approved) and Stoke's reground the face to my dimension. Jim personally gave me some Plastigauage to measure the big end gaps and just one was 0.0003" out of spec as were the rear main bearing and one other, so no reground worth doing. Total cost in 2007 was ?350 just to repair the crank. Sorry, photos too large to display. Five years and 257,000 on the clock and everything there fine.
Anyone else had a problem in this area?
Meg
26/4088 1965 S1½ Old and scruffy but in perfect working order; the car too.
________________Put your money where your mouse is, click on "Support LotusElan.net" below.
26/4088 1965 S1½ Old and scruffy but in perfect working order; the car too.
________________Put your money where your mouse is, click on "Support LotusElan.net" below.
-
Quart Meg Miles - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: 03 Oct 2012
I've not had a failure yet (touch wood) - but looking at that thrust washer that has the grooves around its' face it appears that the wrong side of the thrust washer was facing the crankshaft. I've seen this before in engines - the crank was absolutely mullered, the block was fine, and the thrust washer was in the bottom of the sump!
Good work on the repair though - it's good to know that things can be saved, despite cost! I'm a fan of recycling/repairing where possible!
Roll on another 250,000 miles!
Good work on the repair though - it's good to know that things can be saved, despite cost! I'm a fan of recycling/repairing where possible!
Roll on another 250,000 miles!
-
promotor - Fourth Gear
- Posts: 796
- Joined: 16 Mar 2012
Yep, one of them fitted the wrong way round.
I used to build loads of fast road and race engines, I am ashamed to admit that I too once made this mistake and it was on an engine for a good friend as well, I dont know what I must have been thinking, drinking or on at the time!
Still but for learning from my mistakes I would still be pretty ignorant.
I used to build loads of fast road and race engines, I am ashamed to admit that I too once made this mistake and it was on an engine for a good friend as well, I dont know what I must have been thinking, drinking or on at the time!
Still but for learning from my mistakes I would still be pretty ignorant.
- Chancer
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1132
- Joined: 20 Mar 2012
Nobody's perfect! Curiously the washer with the wear, which matched the crank's wear, appears to be the right way around. It is on the flywheel side so took the clutch load and wore so thin that the other one fell down the gap. I don't understand the molten metal pattern on the other washer which looks as though it might have been reversed. No matter, it's fixed and thank you all for your insights.
Here's the reverse of both washers just turned over L-R:
Here's the reverse of both washers just turned over L-R:
Meg
26/4088 1965 S1½ Old and scruffy but in perfect working order; the car too.
________________Put your money where your mouse is, click on "Support LotusElan.net" below.
26/4088 1965 S1½ Old and scruffy but in perfect working order; the car too.
________________Put your money where your mouse is, click on "Support LotusElan.net" below.
-
Quart Meg Miles - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: 03 Oct 2012
Would it not be the thrust washer on the front of the crank which takes the clutch load and not the flywheel side?
- AussieJohn
- Third Gear
- Posts: 440
- Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Don't misunderstand me this forum is great but it really can provide material to keep you awake at night. I rebuilt my engine a couple of thousand miles ago - did I put the thrust washers the right way round?............ should I rush outside, Take the engine out and strip it to find out?...........
- Baggy2
- Third Gear
- Posts: 266
- Joined: 05 Feb 2010
AussieJ, you're probably right in the Southern Hemi where everything is upside down but in the north it is as Chancer states, the clutch pushes the crank into the middle slab of the block. (photo too big to attach).
Baggyboy, don't fret, just wait 50,000 miles unless you're in competitions.
RTFM everybody!
Baggyboy, don't fret, just wait 50,000 miles unless you're in competitions.
RTFM everybody!
Meg
26/4088 1965 S1½ Old and scruffy but in perfect working order; the car too.
________________Put your money where your mouse is, click on "Support LotusElan.net" below.
26/4088 1965 S1½ Old and scruffy but in perfect working order; the car too.
________________Put your money where your mouse is, click on "Support LotusElan.net" below.
-
Quart Meg Miles - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: 03 Oct 2012
I wondered why I had a bu**er of a job putting the clutch on the crank pulley!!!!!!!
- AussieJohn
- Third Gear
- Posts: 440
- Joined: 10 Jun 2007
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests