Which exhaust manifold should I use?

PostPost by: S2Jay » Fri Feb 28, 2014 5:09 pm

Dan, thanks for that clarification.

While at first I was seriously offended at the thought of upsetting the delicate weight distribution balance designed in by the Master, I soon realized that this is just a fiendishly clever way to offset the asymmetric weight distribution of the Driver for those of us with LHD cars at the same time as making space for the Big Tube Headers which I crave. Well Done!

[Note: if you have a RHD car, or you carry a passenger who weighs more than you, please disregard.]

Regards, Jay
just looking for clues at the scene....
S2Jay
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 152
Joined: 21 Dec 2010

PostPost by: S2Jay » Fri Feb 28, 2014 5:16 pm

Concerning the choice of Header or exhaust system material mentioned earlier:

The 2 most common versions of Stainless Steel used by most aftermarket manufacturers of Header & exhaust systems [at least in the U.S.] are Austenitic Stainless Steel T304 [the expensive stuff], and Ferritic stainless steel T409, the cheaper type.

The 409 is classified at the lower entry level of Stainless Steels, and it does have less Chromium and less Nickel than the higher grades. The minor corrosion that occurs takes the form of a brown-ish discoloration acquired over time. T304 has nearly twice the Chromium as 409, 18 to 20% for 304 vs. 10.5 to 11.75% for 409. Nickel is a max of 0.5% in 409 vs. 8 to 12% in 304.

Maybe the easiest way to tell the difference between the 2 types is with a magnet. The 304 is non-magnetic and will not attract a magnet, where the magnet will be drawn to T409.
just looking for clues at the scene....
S2Jay
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 152
Joined: 21 Dec 2010

PostPost by: elanner » Fri Feb 28, 2014 9:10 pm

Ah, that makes sense.

When I purchased my car the backbone cutouts were very small. But the Weber-side engine mount was falling to pieces and the airbox was hitting the footwell during starting. After fitting a new mount the engine popped up an inch or so, canting over a bit. Enough to cause the manifold/headers to occasionally knock against the backbone. So I had to open up the cutouts a tad more (I just got the cover off the car to have a look and reckon that the total is not more than 1/4", less than the 3/8" I guessed before).

Nick
User avatar
elanner
Fourth Gear
Fourth Gear
 
Posts: 547
Joined: 14 Sep 2010

PostPost by: twincamman » Fri Feb 28, 2014 10:35 pm

Ok ....remove the studs and replace them with cap head bolts ...this allows enough room for the headers to slide into place ...Ed
dont close your eyes --you will miss the crash

Editor: On June 12, 2020, Edward Law, AKA TwinCamMan, passed away; his obituary can be read at https://www.friscolanti.com/obituary/edward-law. He will be missed.
User avatar
twincamman
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 2453
Joined: 02 Oct 2003

PostPost by: ricarbo » Sat Mar 01, 2014 11:51 am

My experience is that the mild steel manifold is quieter.
regards
Richard
ricarbo
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 264
Joined: 14 Apr 2010

PostPost by: S2Jay » Sun Mar 09, 2014 5:39 pm

ricarbo wrote:My experience is that the mild steel manifold is quieter.
regards
Richard



The difference in sound attenuation is likely due to the thicker gauge of material generally used for mild steel systems. The thicker material, usually 12 or 14 gauge vs. 16 or 18 gauge with Stainless headers, helps compensate for the lower strength of mild steel vs. stainless, and to allow for some loss due to corrosion over time. A side benefit is that the thicker steel helps contain the exhaust noises.
just looking for clues at the scene....
S2Jay
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 152
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Previous

Total Online:

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests