S2 body separation from chassis strange damage

PostPost by: Lotus Elan » Fri Dec 14, 2018 5:46 pm

Hello all,

after a few weeks I did some progress. It was not easy to find all spots where the Body was bolt on the chassis.
Because some decades ago somebody added extra bolts.
But finally i did it.
Surprise that the chassis has a strange damage. I added some pics.
Maybe somebody of you has an explanation where the bump in the chassis came from.

thanks a lot

rolf
Attachments
img_2293a.jpg and
img_2294a.jpg and
img_2283a.jpg and
img_2286a.jpg and
Lotus Elan
New-tral
 
Posts: 6
Joined: 07 Oct 2018

PostPost by: GLB » Fri Dec 14, 2018 11:02 pm

I think the damage to the frame is from a rotoflex failing and flailing around. Same on my car. Gary
GLB
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 196
Joined: 31 Jan 2018

PostPost by: Chrispy » Sat Dec 15, 2018 7:11 am

I was thinking rotoflex damage too.
Chris
Elan +2 #0245
Exige S2 Supercharged
Chrispy
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 308
Joined: 29 Oct 2017

PostPost by: Lotus Elan » Sat Dec 15, 2018 9:01 am

Thanks a lot,

that sounds realistic.

rolf
Lotus Elan
New-tral
 
Posts: 6
Joined: 07 Oct 2018

PostPost by: geni » Sat Dec 15, 2018 9:04 am

ou bien en essayant de sortir le pont par le cot? en repliant l?g?rement la partie du chassis !
geni
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 230
Joined: 30 Dec 2014

PostPost by: nigelrbfurness » Sat Dec 15, 2018 10:12 am

I've seen this damage before, too. I always assumed it was where the chassis had been "adjusted" to allow easier removal of the diff.
1970 S4SE/1760cc big valve/SA-AX block, L2s, 45DCOEs, 1978 Jensen GT, 1962 AH Sprite, Alfa-Romeo 159, 1966 Bristol Bus, 1947 AEC Regal bus.
nigelrbfurness
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 372
Joined: 04 Apr 2008

PostPost by: 661 » Sat Dec 15, 2018 1:27 pm

Almost certainly a rotoflex explosion and the driveshaft getting wedged up into the chassis
Graeme
S4 SE
S2 GTS
Caterham 420R
Sold - Peterson JPS Exige
User avatar
661
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 1192
Joined: 29 Mar 2012

PostPost by: mbell » Sat Dec 15, 2018 6:36 pm

I agree, roto flex failure damage. Have similar but worse in my car.
'73 +2 130/5 RHD, now on the road and very slowly rolling though a "restoration"
mbell
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 2640
Joined: 07 Jun 2013

PostPost by: Emma-Knight » Sat Dec 15, 2018 9:44 pm

Are the donuts installed the wrong way? looks like driveshaft is fitted to low donut boss, nut to high boss.
Shouldn't it be the other way?
That's how DPO did with my car :shock:
It does create permanent tension in the donuts.
Anna
1965 S2
Emma-Knight
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 363
Joined: 26 Mar 2004

PostPost by: Davidb » Sun Dec 16, 2018 12:53 am

I have evidence of similar damage to my chassis as a result of donut failure-a arm too!
'65 S2 4844
Davidb
Fourth Gear
Fourth Gear
 
Posts: 886
Joined: 02 Jul 2009

PostPost by: Peter +2 » Sun Dec 16, 2018 9:18 pm

I would agree the rotoflexes appear to be the wrong way around.

Peter
1968 +2 BRM
Peter +2
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 272
Joined: 26 May 2010

PostPost by: alan.barker » Tue Dec 18, 2018 3:44 pm

+1 fitted wrong :shock:
Alan
Alan.b Brittany 1972 elan sprint fhc Lagoon Blue 0460E
alan.barker
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 3762
Joined: 06 Dec 2008

PostPost by: webrest7 » Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:54 pm

Yep.
Definetly donut failure, same on my car .
Damage from a previous owner.
It will never happen again I have now installed Elan Trikbits CV conversion . I would give it them serious consideration for the future . They are an excellent improvement and this will never happen again..
webrest7
First Gear
First Gear
 
Posts: 45
Joined: 08 Mar 2017

Total Online:

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests