Brake discs...

PostPost by: Bud English » Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:04 pm

Wish I'd seen this before I did all that masking. I missed it when I blasted the rust off. It goes all the way through to the other side.

Rotor Crack 1.jpg and


Do any of you routinely crack check these or is this fairly uncommon? What's the consensus on changing these? Just replace the one or change them in pairs. The other one looks good and has plenty of thickness left.
Last edited by Bud English on Sat Mar 26, 2022 4:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Bud
1970 +2S Fed 0053N
"Winnemucca - says it all really!!"
Bud English
Fourth Gear
Fourth Gear
 
Posts: 940
Joined: 05 Nov 2011

PostPost by: MickG » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:33 pm

I would change the pair.
In fact in the UK most if not all company's will only sell them in pairs.
Mick G
MickG
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 269
Joined: 14 Jan 2011

PostPost by: jkatthehelm » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:37 pm

And they are inexpensive unless you have an early S1 with the larger pcd.
JK
66 Elan fhc, 72 Elan Plus 2S 130/5, 98 Elise 2.0l Duratec
_____________________________________
Which way up should this be???
jkatthehelm
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 121
Joined: 04 Apr 2006

PostPost by: AHM » Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:21 pm

If you can find one with a similar level of ware then just change one. Rear brakes don't do much of the work.

I don't crack detect but do a close visual inspection.

Satisfy yourself that the result will produce even braking and be safe.
AHM
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 1252
Joined: 19 Apr 2004

PostPost by: Bud English » Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:13 pm

Thanks all.

Here, they are just under $100 each plus shipping for a plain, solid, replacement. Looking at UK eBay prices for pairs, with all the EBC replacements, plain, drilled, slotted or both, makes $100 seem a bit steep for one, "no name", stock one. I do realize that they are in higher demand there and expensive to ship, but....

Okay, having whined about that, I suppose I'll order up a pair and replace them both.

Just for the record, are the rear's originally the same thickness as the fronts? The manual gives only the 10" diameter for the discs, but no thickness spec that I can find.

Are both okay to turn down to 0.335". Nobody local has any information on the minimum thickness for the elan but that's what they show for Triumph 3/8" discs.
Bud
1970 +2S Fed 0053N
"Winnemucca - says it all really!!"
Bud English
Fourth Gear
Fourth Gear
 
Posts: 940
Joined: 05 Nov 2011

PostPost by: lotocone » Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:44 am

Brian Buckland's book indicates the rear discs are 10 mm new (0.3937") and the minimum thickness should be 8.7 mm (0.3425") for an Elan. They are a Lotus only part according to the book.
Bob
1969 S4
lotocone
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 239
Joined: 09 Feb 2010

PostPost by: garyeanderson » Wed Apr 25, 2012 8:41 am

I got curious and did some measuring. I have a pair of new rear rotors that I bought 6 or 8 years back, these measured .378 inch
rear rotor thickness nos 8.JPG and

And I also recently removed a pair of NOS rotors off of my original chassis that was never driven installed 20 years ago and they measured up at .376 inch.
These were cleaned of the surface rust and will install in the sows ear chassis.
rear rotor thickness nos 20.JPG and


Then just because I had them I went out in the garage and measured the rusty stack of rear rotors and there are 4 big pdc and 15 later rotors
rear rotors disturbed.JPG and

These are as follows

Big pdc
,346
.342
,357
.298
Small pdc
.357
.337
.293
.372
.374
.342
.330
.373
.348
.366
.380
.368
.345
.346
.348
all measurements are in inches, Looking at the numbers I guess I would think about re-using any of the ones over .350 and maybe even go as low as .345 inch. just looking at the stack, you can see that I haven't re-used any of them, I just don't like tossing out good Lotus only parts, I have tossed out plenty of fronts, in the pile behind the rears are fronts and one pair of used stock Elan front rotors and one pair of used GT6 or Plus2 fronts.

Gary
User avatar
garyeanderson
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 2634
Joined: 12 Sep 2003

PostPost by: Bud English » Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:52 pm

Sounds like my best bet is to start fresh with a couple of new discs. There are probably better places to try and save a few bucks than the brake system. :shock:
Bud
1970 +2S Fed 0053N
"Winnemucca - says it all really!!"
Bud English
Fourth Gear
Fourth Gear
 
Posts: 940
Joined: 05 Nov 2011

PostPost by: Jason1 » Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:28 pm

Here, they are just under $100 each plus shipping for a plain, solid, replacement.


?24.25 +VAT each from SJ Sportscars
50/0951 1968 Wedgewood blue +2, 1990 Mini Cooper RSP
User avatar
Jason1
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 1346
Joined: 03 Nov 2005

PostPost by: Galwaylotus » Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:31 pm

Jason1 wrote:
Here, they are just under $100 each plus shipping for a plain, solid, replacement.


?24.25 +VAT each from SJ Sportscars

That sounds more like it!
Mechanical Engineer, happily retired!

'67 S3 SE FHC

See Facebook page: W J Barry Photography

Put your money where your mouse is, click on "Support LotusElan.net" below.
User avatar
Galwaylotus
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: 01 May 2006

PostPost by: Bud English » Wed Apr 25, 2012 7:30 pm

The shipping estimates I got from vendors in the UK were 40 - 60? for a pair of discs. I ordered them from Dave Bean in California. I'll have them day after tomorrow.
Bud
1970 +2S Fed 0053N
"Winnemucca - says it all really!!"
Bud English
Fourth Gear
Fourth Gear
 
Posts: 940
Joined: 05 Nov 2011

PostPost by: CBUEB1771 » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:48 pm

lotocone wrote:Brian Buckland's book indicates the rear discs are 10 mm new (0.3937") and the minimum thickness should be 8.7 mm (0.3425") for an Elan. They are a Lotus only part according to the book.


It is not likely that the discs were originally dimensioned in metric units. The rear discs were probably designed as 0.375 inches thick which is consistent with Gary's measurements. Neither the Elan or Elan +2 work shop manuals provide new or minimum thicknesses, only the maximum allowable run-out of 0.004 inches.
Russ Newton
Elan +2S (1971)
Elite S2 (1962)
User avatar
CBUEB1771
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 1546
Joined: 09 Nov 2006

PostPost by: cal44 » Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:09 pm

Bud,

you did the right thing. Messing around too find the best deal usually turns out too be, in my case, a fools errand.
I can't tell you how many times in the past I've wasted time looking for "the deal".

Gary, put some oil on those rotors!

Mike
"Be Polite, Be Professional, But have a plan to kill everyone you meet"
General "Mad Dog" James Mattis United States Marines
cal44
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 498
Joined: 28 Nov 2010

PostPost by: alan.barker » Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:18 pm

hi bud english,
for me after 35+ years of lotus it is o.k. just to replace one rear brake disk. I had a rear cracked disk which caused vibration. I bought just one new one and had the locating lugs on the outboard driveshaft surfaced. After there were no problems.
Alan B
Alan.b Brittany 1972 elan sprint fhc Lagoon Blue 0460E
alan.barker
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 3762
Joined: 06 Dec 2008

PostPost by: Bud English » Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:17 pm

Hi Alan,

I appreciate your input and that of everyone else.

I replaced them both because my "good" one only measures 0.331" (8.4mm) thick. Didn't want to risk it and didn't want to be tearing into the car again in the near future. Had this one been thicker I would have sought out a used replacement of similar thickness or a new one.
Bud
1970 +2S Fed 0053N
"Winnemucca - says it all really!!"
Bud English
Fourth Gear
Fourth Gear
 
Posts: 940
Joined: 05 Nov 2011

Total Online:

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests