Decisions need to be made!
21 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Good explanation, Kev.
As for S/130 cars, they don't use the earlier system of black plastic buckets pop-riveted onto the lower valance fiberglass. Presumably the factory felt these plastic buckets were not capable of supporting the weight of the square 8 lamps so needed a (pretty heavy) metal bracket. The S/130 cars have a one piece valance with molded in fog/driving lamp buckets, and I guess the glass is sufficient to support the lamps (along with large washers).
Nice. Thanks for that info on the S/130s . . .
As for S/130 cars, they don't use the earlier system of black plastic buckets pop-riveted onto the lower valance fiberglass. Presumably the factory felt these plastic buckets were not capable of supporting the weight of the square 8 lamps so needed a (pretty heavy) metal bracket. The S/130 cars have a one piece valance with molded in fog/driving lamp buckets, and I guess the glass is sufficient to support the lamps (along with large washers).
Nice. Thanks for that info on the S/130s . . .
-
Sea Ranch - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1141
- Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Could someone indicate an image of an original "lipped" rear bumper, so I will be able to tell the difference? (I assume the lip is underneath?)
Cheers.
Vince
Cheers.
Vince
- vincereynard
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: 12 Jan 2015
Not a replacement rear bumper but what the b'stard chromers did to the lip...
John
John
-
john.p.clegg - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 5745
- Joined: 21 Sep 2003
They have to remove " things " back to the metal....the "polisher " was a little heavy handed ...when I got it back it weighed considerably less and was " floppy " my heart sank as my anger rose.
John
John
-
john.p.clegg - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 5745
- Joined: 21 Sep 2003
In order to get some experience I went to Paul Matty today to have a look at this :-
http://www.paulmattysportscars.co.uk/sh ... px?id=3897
It was a bit of a shock at first but mostly went well. It even got approved by Mrs R, which is always a plus!
It ticked a lot of boxes.
Only major problem was / is a very heavy clutch along with, what I considered, was stiff and sticky gear change.
Hardly what I had expected from the much vaunted 2000E. I've driven other cars with the same box without a problem.
So i'm wondering if the 2 issues are linked. When the engine and box were rebuilt I would think it likely that the clutch was renewed as a matter of course. Could it be wrong / a heavy competition unit / not freeing properly.
Maybe I was partly to blame for not shoving it right to the floor?
No matter. It was good experience, confirmed that a +2 is the way to go, and that it should preferable be a later S type.
The search begins in ernest. (Or Bromsgrove in this case!)
Vince
As an aside, I was a student Engineer at FoMoCo in the late 60's, drove scores of new Fords, and the Corsair 2000E was a firm favourite. Much nicer that the flimsy Cortina and immeasurably preferable to that obese, flabby lump the Zephyr / Zodiac Mark IV.
http://www.paulmattysportscars.co.uk/sh ... px?id=3897
It was a bit of a shock at first but mostly went well. It even got approved by Mrs R, which is always a plus!
It ticked a lot of boxes.
Only major problem was / is a very heavy clutch along with, what I considered, was stiff and sticky gear change.
Hardly what I had expected from the much vaunted 2000E. I've driven other cars with the same box without a problem.
So i'm wondering if the 2 issues are linked. When the engine and box were rebuilt I would think it likely that the clutch was renewed as a matter of course. Could it be wrong / a heavy competition unit / not freeing properly.
Maybe I was partly to blame for not shoving it right to the floor?
No matter. It was good experience, confirmed that a +2 is the way to go, and that it should preferable be a later S type.
The search begins in ernest. (Or Bromsgrove in this case!)
Vince
As an aside, I was a student Engineer at FoMoCo in the late 60's, drove scores of new Fords, and the Corsair 2000E was a firm favourite. Much nicer that the flimsy Cortina and immeasurably preferable to that obese, flabby lump the Zephyr / Zodiac Mark IV.
- vincereynard
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: 12 Jan 2015
21 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests