Quintessential British Sports Car
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Elan content from the NYT
Cars reflect the culture and roads of the country that made them.
Chasing the Quintessential British Sports Car[
RICHARD S. CHANG
American sports cars are built like bulldogs. Italian sports cars are sexy. Japanese sports cars are manga and robotic. Describing the essence of a British sports car is more elusive.
http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/04 ... /?emc=eta1
Cars reflect the culture and roads of the country that made them.
Chasing the Quintessential British Sports Car[
RICHARD S. CHANG
American sports cars are built like bulldogs. Italian sports cars are sexy. Japanese sports cars are manga and robotic. Describing the essence of a British sports car is more elusive.
http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/04 ... /?emc=eta1
-
ecamiel - Third Gear
- Posts: 263
- Joined: 02 Oct 2003
Brilliant article. Even the readers comments at the end make for a good read...
Now where did I put my Mustang
Now where did I put my Mustang
-
mark030358 - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1267
- Joined: 29 May 2004
My comment would be to paraphrase the one one comment "The quintessential English sports car experience was having it fail at OPPORTUNE moments"
-
Fred Talmadge - Fourth Gear
- Posts: 675
- Joined: 24 Sep 2003
I learned something from the article (Peter Stevens contribution):
The MG and Austin Healey, and all of those companies, made sports cars that anybody who could afford a car could afford to choose a sports car, which I thought was very nice. It was very simple and accessible for anybody.?
That?s important?
?It is to me,? he said. ?That?s something we used to do so well. Because something like the Triumph TR2 would?ve been cheaper to buy than the saloon car that Triumph made.?
As my paper round money was only enough to buy and sell pushbikes I didnt know the relative prices of cars but its logical that a TR2 should cost less than a Standard Vanguard, a spitfire less than a Herald, a Frogeye less than an A35/40 etc, what is ironic is that had they known that they could charge a premium for supplying less, indeed should have done so to create desirabillity they would have been much more profitable and more of them may have survived.
The MG and Austin Healey, and all of those companies, made sports cars that anybody who could afford a car could afford to choose a sports car, which I thought was very nice. It was very simple and accessible for anybody.?
That?s important?
?It is to me,? he said. ?That?s something we used to do so well. Because something like the Triumph TR2 would?ve been cheaper to buy than the saloon car that Triumph made.?
As my paper round money was only enough to buy and sell pushbikes I didnt know the relative prices of cars but its logical that a TR2 should cost less than a Standard Vanguard, a spitfire less than a Herald, a Frogeye less than an A35/40 etc, what is ironic is that had they known that they could charge a premium for supplying less, indeed should have done so to create desirabillity they would have been much more profitable and more of them may have survived.
- Chancer
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1370
- Joined: 20 Mar 2012
People who think British sports cars were unreliable and fragile have never owned a modern French car... At least the cars from the 60s and 70s were relatively easy and cheap to fix...
-
pereirac - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1136
- Joined: 01 Oct 2003
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests