Is 11.5/1 CR to high for US premium gas
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Hi all, is an 11.5/1 CR to high for US premium 92/93 (R+M)/2
octane pump gas.
Are the thicker Head gaskets availiable that could help reduce CR?
I have heard of some solid copper head gaskets...
For clarfication purposes
European pumps deliver 95 (RON) as "regular", equivalent to 90-91 US
(R+M)/2
James
octane pump gas.
Are the thicker Head gaskets availiable that could help reduce CR?
I have heard of some solid copper head gaskets...
For clarfication purposes
European pumps deliver 95 (RON) as "regular", equivalent to 90-91 US
(R+M)/2
James
-
holywood3645 - Fourth Gear
- Posts: 894
- Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Hi James.
Good question. I'd be very leery of any hemi head, road CR exceeding 10.5:1. The best available pump gas available here in CT, USA (North East, USA) is 93, (R+M)/2.
The way I understand it, a hemi head, like the twin cam, is a fast burn combustion chamber. To slow down the flame front, one needs a high octane gas to avoid detonation. Risers on the piston increase CR but may also slow down the flame front due to geometry, a bit of a trade off. Still, exceed 10.5:1 with reluctance.
If pinging is apparent under high load conditions (full throttle and relatively low rpm), one can always dial back the ignition timing. To do so however, reduces torque and hp. It is my opinion, that excessive CR ,offset by reduced ignition advance, verses lower CR with more advanced (near book values) ignition timing, is a net looser. Others may have a different opinion.
Bill
Bill
Good question. I'd be very leery of any hemi head, road CR exceeding 10.5:1. The best available pump gas available here in CT, USA (North East, USA) is 93, (R+M)/2.
The way I understand it, a hemi head, like the twin cam, is a fast burn combustion chamber. To slow down the flame front, one needs a high octane gas to avoid detonation. Risers on the piston increase CR but may also slow down the flame front due to geometry, a bit of a trade off. Still, exceed 10.5:1 with reluctance.
If pinging is apparent under high load conditions (full throttle and relatively low rpm), one can always dial back the ignition timing. To do so however, reduces torque and hp. It is my opinion, that excessive CR ,offset by reduced ignition advance, verses lower CR with more advanced (near book values) ignition timing, is a net looser. Others may have a different opinion.
Bill
Bill
- bill308
- Fourth Gear
- Posts: 736
- Joined: 27 May 2004
At the time of my build, I was looking a the same issue. My pistons needed decked for compression. My builder (a well known Lotus race builder) advised me that 10.5:1 was about the limit for a street driven, pump gas motor.
14 years later, I only have good things to report on the results. Pinging has never been a problem.
14 years later, I only have good things to report on the results. Pinging has never been a problem.
Mike
- elancoupe
- Fourth Gear
- Posts: 759
- Joined: 11 Sep 2003
11.5 is probably to high without a fully mapped fuel injection / ignition system and a knock sensor.
10.5 is the limit I would use. In Australia you can get modern composite style head gaskets in a range of thicknesses to help get the right compression ratio. The Elan Factory can supply them.
regards
Rohan
10.5 is the limit I would use. In Australia you can get modern composite style head gaskets in a range of thicknesses to help get the right compression ratio. The Elan Factory can supply them.
regards
Rohan
-
rgh0 - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 8415
- Joined: 22 Sep 2003
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests