Plus 2 fuel tank venting
30 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
HCA wrote:With the vent to atmoshere fitted with a Newton, and the filler neck properly sealed with a good rubber washer in the cap, there should be no need for an anti return valve…
In theory yes of course you are correct.
However the reality is that fuel actually does slosh past the seal. The whole +2 tank design is so really poor with the filler being half way up the side of the tank. It needs a complete re-design!
This is what I think happens:-Without the MX5 non return valve fitted the fuel, under hard cornering, travels back up the filler pipe with such inertia force that it just momentarily lifts the fuel cap seal pressure spring of its seat and this is when fuel leaks out.
With a MX5 non return valve fitted the fuel can't travel back up the filler pipe so this can't happen.
Alan.
Last edited by alanr on Tue Mar 07, 2023 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Alan
'71 +2 S130/ 5speed Type9.
'71 +2 S130/ 5speed Type9.
- alanr
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: 14 Sep 2018
HCA wrote:
and yes, it is schematic only - the vent pipe runs will be over the tank etc..
Seal the vent, so when you get vacuum from fuel being delivered to the engine, you need to replace the fuel with air
Born, and brought home from the hospital (no seat belt (wtf)) in a baby!
Find out where the limits are, and start from there
Love your Mother
Earth
Find out where the limits are, and start from there
Love your Mother
Earth
-
h20hamelan - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010
I had thought the Newton Valve required larger volume than available. For as while filling tank. I didn’t realize it was designed for tanks with the filler 1/2 way.
The CL or MX5 vents to filler, and as long as the vent pipe is above height of tank. From
https://www.newton-equipment.com/pdfs/v ... AA-020.pdf
Their intank valve is also 0.6 L per S
The 0.6L per second is likely enough, I suppose it depends on how much your pump flows. I sort of thought it was about equal and I haven’t thought too much about it.
My pardon HCA for being ignorant, I suspect you have no issue filling your tank with your shown diagram?
The CL or MX5 vents to filler, and as long as the vent pipe is above height of tank. From
https://www.newton-equipment.com/pdfs/v ... AA-020.pdf
Their intank valve is also 0.6 L per S
The 0.6L per second is likely enough, I suppose it depends on how much your pump flows. I sort of thought it was about equal and I haven’t thought too much about it.
My pardon HCA for being ignorant, I suspect you have no issue filling your tank with your shown diagram?
Born, and brought home from the hospital (no seat belt (wtf)) in a baby!
Find out where the limits are, and start from there
Love your Mother
Earth
Find out where the limits are, and start from there
Love your Mother
Earth
-
h20hamelan - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Argh, get it.
The Newton allows air in, and therefore one can cap etc the existing.
Back to work I go
The Newton allows air in, and therefore one can cap etc the existing.
Back to work I go
Born, and brought home from the hospital (no seat belt (wtf)) in a baby!
Find out where the limits are, and start from there
Love your Mother
Earth
Find out where the limits are, and start from there
Love your Mother
Earth
-
h20hamelan - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010
h20hamelan wrote:The Newton allows air in, and therefore one can cap etc the existing.
Correct it lets air in under slight vacuum caused by fuel pump pulling fuel out of the tank. When not running it seals the vent line avoiding fuel smells/loss, however it will vent the tank if the pressure builds over a certain pressure.
The problem is that filling the tank will probably not reach that pressure to make it vent and even if it does the air flow out rate will be lower than needed to fill the tank. So you still need an extra high flow vent solution for filling the car.
'73 +2 130/5 RHD, now on the road and very slowly rolling though a "restoration"
- mbell
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 2643
- Joined: 07 Jun 2013
Ah, okay. I have a couple +2’s to figure this out.
One has the MX5, and until now I was confused as to how the venting while filling would work.
Maybe someone like HCA or…who has this system could let us know their experiences.
I see Newton has a tank vent that is claimed for flow rates of F1. But all I can find is 0.6
One has the MX5, and until now I was confused as to how the venting while filling would work.
Maybe someone like HCA or…who has this system could let us know their experiences.
I see Newton has a tank vent that is claimed for flow rates of F1. But all I can find is 0.6
Born, and brought home from the hospital (no seat belt (wtf)) in a baby!
Find out where the limits are, and start from there
Love your Mother
Earth
Find out where the limits are, and start from there
Love your Mother
Earth
-
h20hamelan - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Again, the Newton design valve has no relation to venting whilst filling.
The poor fillling properties of a +2 have less to do with venting, rather they are due to fluid mechanics and poor design.
After the initial easy fill part, when the tank level meets the filler neck, you in effect have two interconnected reservoirs. The problem now becomes a reliance on the speed of flow berween the interconnection - fuel delivery pumps will fill the filler neck ‘reservoir’ quicker than it can empty itself into the larger reservoir that is the tank. A largere vent than what exists will not lessen the time it takes for the levels in the tank and filler neck to equalise.
But if you think the +2 is a filling joke, spare a thought for the twin tanked Minis of the age..!
The poor fillling properties of a +2 have less to do with venting, rather they are due to fluid mechanics and poor design.
After the initial easy fill part, when the tank level meets the filler neck, you in effect have two interconnected reservoirs. The problem now becomes a reliance on the speed of flow berween the interconnection - fuel delivery pumps will fill the filler neck ‘reservoir’ quicker than it can empty itself into the larger reservoir that is the tank. A largere vent than what exists will not lessen the time it takes for the levels in the tank and filler neck to equalise.
But if you think the +2 is a filling joke, spare a thought for the twin tanked Minis of the age..!
Hal Adams
Evora SR
Elan +2
Evora SR
Elan +2
-
HCA - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: 03 Jan 2020
Question here on the Miata valve installation.
I have the Miata valve here somewhere and will be working on the fuel system shortly. The valve outside diameter looks considerably smaller than the Plus 2 filler elbow. How are you folks mounting the valve? If a rubber bush/transition or similar is needed, does someone have an easy online link (that will hopefully ship to Canada) available? I have kinda struck out locally in finding a fuel compatible solution.
Thanks in advance
I have the Miata valve here somewhere and will be working on the fuel system shortly. The valve outside diameter looks considerably smaller than the Plus 2 filler elbow. How are you folks mounting the valve? If a rubber bush/transition or similar is needed, does someone have an easy online link (that will hopefully ship to Canada) available? I have kinda struck out locally in finding a fuel compatible solution.
Thanks in advance
Stu
1969 Plus 2 Federal LHD
1969 Plus 2 Federal LHD
-
stugilmour - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007
As it happens, I book marked a long thread on this subject, that I never deleted:
viewtopic.php?f=40&t=31759
I never used it as I opted to seal the system and use a Newton designed valve that I think is far better...
viewtopic.php?f=40&t=31759
I never used it as I opted to seal the system and use a Newton designed valve that I think is far better...
Hal Adams
Evora SR
Elan +2
Evora SR
Elan +2
-
HCA - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: 03 Jan 2020
john.p.clegg wrote:bet it cost an arm and a leg though....
John
If you were responding to my post, I don't recall it being expensive, I think twenty-odd USD for 25 feet of it.
1970 Elan Plus 2 (not S) 50/2036
2012 BMW R1200GS
"It just wouldn't be a complete day if I didn't forget something!" -Me
2012 BMW R1200GS
"It just wouldn't be a complete day if I didn't forget something!" -Me
-
The Veg - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 2188
- Joined: 16 Nov 2015
30 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests