S1 thru Sprint Fuel Tank differences
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Does anyone have any knowledge of differences in the Elan fuel tanks? Specifically the angle of the fuel filler, and the internal baffle position and configuration? Do early tank (S1&S2) internal baffle dimensions differ in the dimension from the sending unit flange to the baffle? Is there a different angle to the filler neck from series to series? I don't want to elaberate why I'm asking this question yet, except that I have an interest in knowing, and hopefully someone has the answers.
- Tahoe
- Fourth Gear
- Posts: 643
- Joined: 19 Sep 2010
[quote="frearther"]There's a baffle in an S2 tank? I guess the PO must have done a modification.[/quote]
I think I would assume that all fuel tanks have internal baffles. Maybe its only one bit of bent metal but any sort of 'wall' inside the tank is going to significantly stop the fuel sloshing around.
From memory (not having seen inside the boot of an S1 for a few years) I think the tanks through the whole life of the car did not change much.
Ian
I think I would assume that all fuel tanks have internal baffles. Maybe its only one bit of bent metal but any sort of 'wall' inside the tank is going to significantly stop the fuel sloshing around.
From memory (not having seen inside the boot of an S1 for a few years) I think the tanks through the whole life of the car did not change much.
Ian
-
Elanman99 - Fourth Gear
- Posts: 742
- Joined: 11 Sep 2003
My S2 has a baffle and the tank appears original.
Rob Walker
26-4889
Rob Walker
26-4889
Rob Walker
26-4889
50-0315N
1964 Sabra GT
1964 Elva Mk4T Coupe (awaiting restoration)
1965 Ford Falcon Ranchero, 302,AOD,9",rack and pinion,disc,etc,etc,etc
1954 Nash Healey LeMans Coupe
Owning a Lotus will get you off the couch
26-4889
50-0315N
1964 Sabra GT
1964 Elva Mk4T Coupe (awaiting restoration)
1965 Ford Falcon Ranchero, 302,AOD,9",rack and pinion,disc,etc,etc,etc
1954 Nash Healey LeMans Coupe
Owning a Lotus will get you off the couch
- prezoom
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: 16 Mar 2009
The reason I asked is because mine is also original and has a baffle, but I was wondering if that baffle distance ever changed in the fuel tank run from beginning to end. The distance I'm talking about is from the mounting flange to the actual baffle. It's critical for clearance of the sending unit float. I guess if the baffle were in the wrong place then you could shorten the float arm, but then you don't get an accurate reading for the gauge. I know senders were different fom early to late series so I was wondering if the actual float arm distance ever changed.
- Tahoe
- Fourth Gear
- Posts: 643
- Joined: 19 Sep 2010
I just got home and measered both my original sending unit with float, and the distance from the flange to the baffle inside the original tank. At the longest point the float was 8 1/2 inches from the mounting surface to the farthest point of the float. The distance to the baffle was 9 7/8 inches. So 1 3/8 inches of clearance at the closest point, so plenty of clearance to swing freely.
Anyone have an S3, S4, or Sprint sending unit they can measure for comparison? If you do I'd like to know from the face of the flange to the furthest point of the float.
Anyone have an S3, S4, or Sprint sending unit they can measure for comparison? If you do I'd like to know from the face of the flange to the furthest point of the float.
- Tahoe
- Fourth Gear
- Posts: 643
- Joined: 19 Sep 2010
I didn't know about the clocking of the holes (I'm going to check mine tonight), but I've been told the later sending unit reads just the opposite of the early one, i.e. an early gauge would read backwards on later sending unit.
FYI, I've received 2 emails from owners who measured the depth of the baffle, and both came up with my dimension of 10 inches from the mounting flange. It's still not clear if the later sending unit was shorter and therefore the baffle was closer. Someday we'll find out.
FYI, I've received 2 emails from owners who measured the depth of the baffle, and both came up with my dimension of 10 inches from the mounting flange. It's still not clear if the later sending unit was shorter and therefore the baffle was closer. Someday we'll find out.
- Tahoe
- Fourth Gear
- Posts: 643
- Joined: 19 Sep 2010
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests