Burton front cover question

PostPost by: elancoupe » Mon Mar 27, 2023 1:03 pm

I am in the process of installing a Burton cassette setup. When I went to trial fit the half moon sump gasket , I found that it would not fit due to the gap being too narrow. Has anyone else run into this? I have a number of half moons, cork, rubber and plastic, none of them are quite right.

Below is a comparison of a stock front cover vs the Burton.
Attachments
4ACD211C-1EB4-4B37-A9E7-87DE26640DDB.jpeg and
90CF91AB-D9BD-4BE4-9F37-44D81A530CE4.jpeg and
Mike
elancoupe
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: 11 Sep 2003

PostPost by: 2cams70 » Tue Mar 28, 2023 10:36 am

Anything is possible with those Burton covers. From the picture it looks to be a very rough casting in that area. If it’s not the same width as the original cover it is wrong and question then becomes how wrong. What do they measure - original versus Burton’s?
1970 Ford Escort Twin Cam
1972 Ford Escort GT1600 Twin Cam
1980 Ford Escort 2.0 Ghia
Peugeot 505 GTI Wagons (5spdx1) (Autox1)
2022 Ford Fiesta ST.
2cams70
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 2046
Joined: 10 Jun 2015

PostPost by: elancoupe » Tue Mar 28, 2023 1:11 pm

The stock cover gap is 7mm, Burton 5 mm.
Mike
elancoupe
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: 11 Sep 2003

PostPost by: 2cams70 » Thu Mar 30, 2023 1:51 am

It it were me I’d go back to Burton’s and complain. If you do I’d be interested in hearing what their response is.
1970 Ford Escort Twin Cam
1972 Ford Escort GT1600 Twin Cam
1980 Ford Escort 2.0 Ghia
Peugeot 505 GTI Wagons (5spdx1) (Autox1)
2022 Ford Fiesta ST.
2cams70
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 2046
Joined: 10 Jun 2015

PostPost by: rgh0 » Thu Mar 30, 2023 12:04 pm

Well I hate to spoil the party with data but here goes :lol:

The front cover seal groove was 5.5 mm originally and is the same on all the modern replacements I have bought both from Burtons and others . It looks like your original cover has been machined to widen the groove for some reason ... probably because they had a seal set that did not fit.

The rear seal carrier groove was 7.0 mm in the orginal Ford implementation of the cork sealing version rear lip seal carrier and 9.7mm on the later rubber seal implementation. Lotus stayed with the 7.0 mm version through out the engine production.

There are many issues that have been previously discussed of the cork seals not fitting due to these differences and the seal kit suppliers not understanding the differences.

Yes the Burtons casting you have looks like crap also in the seal area and i would be worried about porosity in the casting especially around the coolant containing areas

cheers
Rohan
User avatar
rgh0
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 8814
Joined: 22 Sep 2003

PostPost by: 2cams70 » Thu Mar 30, 2023 12:47 pm

rgh0 wrote:Well I hate to spoil the party with data but here goes

The front cover seal groove was 5.5 mm originally and is the same on all the modern replacements I have bought both from Burtons and others . It looks like your original cover has been machined to widen the groove for some reason ... probably because they had a seal set that did not fit.


Only correct if there wasn't an unknown design change implemented during the production run - nothing surprises me with these engines. That groove in the cover pictured actually looks quite original but without seeing in in the flesh it's difficult to know. The other possibility is that the cover that seems to be original Lotus is not in fact original Lotus.
1970 Ford Escort Twin Cam
1972 Ford Escort GT1600 Twin Cam
1980 Ford Escort 2.0 Ghia
Peugeot 505 GTI Wagons (5spdx1) (Autox1)
2022 Ford Fiesta ST.
2cams70
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 2046
Joined: 10 Jun 2015

PostPost by: rgh0 » Thu Mar 30, 2023 12:51 pm

Anything is possible with Lotus manufacturing consistency .....but I have a range of spare front covers both orginal from early and late engines and some new replacement covers and they are all 5.5 mm.
User avatar
rgh0
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 8814
Joined: 22 Sep 2003

PostPost by: smo17003 » Thu Mar 30, 2023 4:53 pm

I have just checked a Lotus cover and a Burton version - both measure at 5.5mm.

Mike
Mike
1967 S3 FHC
1968 S4 FHC
smo17003
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 348
Joined: 11 May 2006

PostPost by: 2cams70 » Thu Apr 13, 2023 11:51 am

I found my original Lotus front cover today during a clean up. The seal groove measures 6.3mm for most of it's circumference however for the last 15mm or so at each end it measures 7.0mm. There's actually obvious machining of the groove that has occurred over this 15mm length to take it out to 7.0mm. Original cover and 1970 Escort Twin Cam application with the big wing sump. Something must have happened during production if earlier ones are 5.5mm or it might have something to do with the type of sump fitted - big wing or Cortina.
1970 Ford Escort Twin Cam
1972 Ford Escort GT1600 Twin Cam
1980 Ford Escort 2.0 Ghia
Peugeot 505 GTI Wagons (5spdx1) (Autox1)
2022 Ford Fiesta ST.
2cams70
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 2046
Joined: 10 Jun 2015

PostPost by: HCA » Thu Apr 13, 2023 5:19 pm

My brand new, yet to be fitted standard front cover groove is 7mm at the top, narrowing to a very tight 6mm at the groove base. The matching cork is 6mm wide...
Hal Adams
Evora S
Elan +2
User avatar
HCA
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 1119
Joined: 03 Jan 2020

PostPost by: types26/36 » Thu Apr 13, 2023 5:58 pm

I just checked three original timing cases and non are what could be described as “precision machining” with them varying from 5+ mm to 6+ mm but non were 7mm.
Attachments
2.jpg and
4.jpg and
6.jpg and
Brian
64 S2 Roadster
72 Sprint FHC
User avatar
types26/36
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 3872
Joined: 11 Sep 2003

PostPost by: RichardHawkins » Thu Apr 13, 2023 6:46 pm

I don’t think mine was machined, I looks like an as cast finish!

Richard Hawkins
RichardHawkins
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 1206
Joined: 05 Jul 2008

PostPost by: types26/36 » Thu Apr 13, 2023 6:52 pm

Yes I think you are right, probably why there is such a variation in all the cases. Colins way of keeping the costs down :lol:
Brian
64 S2 Roadster
72 Sprint FHC
User avatar
types26/36
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 3872
Joined: 11 Sep 2003

Total Online:

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests