Engine Breathers
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Hello All
Hope some of you have an opinion. I have a standard breather tube from the rear of the cylinder head into a catch tank. How much additional benefit would I achieve by fitting a second breather to the front of the cam cover and / or to the oil filler cap ?
My thoughts are that extra breathing may assist in the reduction of engine smoke. As an amateur am I correct or incorrect ?
Thank you
Hope some of you have an opinion. I have a standard breather tube from the rear of the cylinder head into a catch tank. How much additional benefit would I achieve by fitting a second breather to the front of the cam cover and / or to the oil filler cap ?
My thoughts are that extra breathing may assist in the reduction of engine smoke. As an amateur am I correct or incorrect ?
Thank you
- J J DIKKE
- First Gear
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 27 May 2018
Look at a 'Hart Breather' - fitted to front of cam cover. TTR do them (though silly price IMO)
I was more interested in these potentially to reduce oil leaks due to 'normal' blow by - if you have smoke then you probably have something else to investigate
I was more interested in these potentially to reduce oil leaks due to 'normal' blow by - if you have smoke then you probably have something else to investigate
- jono
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1859
- Joined: 17 May 2007
Hello and thank you for that. I think its a probability that I have something else to investigate regarding the internals of this engine however, I did wonder if additional breathers may reduce pressure and possibly exhaust smoke as a short term improvement. As I say, I am only an amateur at this.
Thank you.
Thank you.
- J J DIKKE
- First Gear
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 27 May 2018
Hi JJ,
It would be helpful to know where exactly is the engine smoke coming from currently?
Thanks
Iain
It would be helpful to know where exactly is the engine smoke coming from currently?
Thanks
Iain
72 Sprint - 0363E
74 S130/5 - 1931L
74 S130/5 - 1931L
- sprintsoft
- Third Gear
- Posts: 225
- Joined: 18 Mar 2019
I have chosen that route choosing to run a hose from the rear breather to a "T" piece picking up the hose coming from front timing case and then continuing on to a catch tank placed in the front nose.
Everyone will probably have their own preference but this works for me.
Everyone will probably have their own preference but this works for me.
- webrest7
- Second Gear
- Posts: 55
- Joined: 08 Mar 2017
Air/oil separators (AOS) are relatively inexpensive these days and permit you to vent the crankcase into the airbox while keeping the oil mist in the carbs to a minimum. Running the vent into the airbox via an AOS has the benefit of reducing crankcase pressure which minimizes oil leaks.
As mentioned above, an improved crankcase vent will not appreciably reduce engine smoking out the exhaust pipe as that is more likely caused by worn rings or valve guides.
As mentioned above, an improved crankcase vent will not appreciably reduce engine smoking out the exhaust pipe as that is more likely caused by worn rings or valve guides.
Steve
Elan S1 1963-Bourne bodied
Elan S3 1967 FHC pre airflow
Formerly:
Elan S1 1964
Elan S3 1966 FHC pre airflow
Elan S3 1967 FHC airflow
Elan S4 1969 FHC
Europa S2 1970
Esprit S2 1979
Elan S1 1963-Bourne bodied
Elan S3 1967 FHC pre airflow
Formerly:
Elan S1 1964
Elan S3 1966 FHC pre airflow
Elan S3 1967 FHC airflow
Elan S4 1969 FHC
Europa S2 1970
Esprit S2 1979
- bitsobrits
- Third Gear
- Posts: 418
- Joined: 27 Apr 2011
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: MACCA.GLM and 37 guests