Which Zetec engine
23 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
I am not a stickler for originality. I have fitted electric fuel pump, electronic ignition etc. However, to me an elan without a twincam is something and nothing. Why not just buy something else? There is no end of choice out there.
This year I had my engine rebuilt by a race engine man at the cost of ?1190. This included relining and new pistons. I now have a sweet running engine with no oil leaks and which uses almost no oil. It is a joy to drive. I know people quote ?5000 for a rebuild but I can't see where they get that from.
If you want something quicker, I have a 1700 crossflow tall block conversion which I am going to have rebuilt which will run on 45dcoe carbs. Then of course diff output shafts will need looking at etc, etc.
I still can't see the point of buying a 35 year old car and putting a modern engine in it.
Just my opinion.
Chris
This year I had my engine rebuilt by a race engine man at the cost of ?1190. This included relining and new pistons. I now have a sweet running engine with no oil leaks and which uses almost no oil. It is a joy to drive. I know people quote ?5000 for a rebuild but I can't see where they get that from.
If you want something quicker, I have a 1700 crossflow tall block conversion which I am going to have rebuilt which will run on 45dcoe carbs. Then of course diff output shafts will need looking at etc, etc.
I still can't see the point of buying a 35 year old car and putting a modern engine in it.
Just my opinion.
Chris
- chrishewett
- Third Gear
- Posts: 407
- Joined: 06 Oct 2003
I can see that keeping a baby Elan original is the best way to go but an old Plus 2 is worth very little when they have been let go a bit.
I have a Plus 2 but it has no engine. Previous owner found it worth more in parts than as a whole. I would love to put a Twincam back in but when the Spyder chassis seems to take the Zetec and MT75 with no problem and they are about ?250 to buy rather than ?2000+ for a rebuilt Twincam I cant justify it.
That said I'm not keen on the way the Spyder Zetec has the wheels so far out in the wheel arches. I plan to build one with original hubs to keep it looking original from the outside at least.
I have a Plus 2 but it has no engine. Previous owner found it worth more in parts than as a whole. I would love to put a Twincam back in but when the Spyder chassis seems to take the Zetec and MT75 with no problem and they are about ?250 to buy rather than ?2000+ for a rebuilt Twincam I cant justify it.
That said I'm not keen on the way the Spyder Zetec has the wheels so far out in the wheel arches. I plan to build one with original hubs to keep it looking original from the outside at least.
-
SimonH - Third Gear
- Posts: 296
- Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Guys,
I was down at Spyder a wee while back to have my rear suspension converted to small diameter springs. Got into conversation with Andy re Duratec into Spyder +2, answer came back straight away "too tall".
I did not persue it any futher but I would think that would mean a bulging bonnet.
Doug
I was down at Spyder a wee while back to have my rear suspension converted to small diameter springs. Got into conversation with Andy re Duratec into Spyder +2, answer came back straight away "too tall".
I did not persue it any futher but I would think that would mean a bulging bonnet.
Doug
-
dougweall - Second Gear
- Posts: 177
- Joined: 12 Sep 2003
This thread has run rather further than I expected without really answering the original questions! I've bought the Zetec engine now and I'll keep detailed notes on progress for future generations.
A few comments. I know a fair number have replaced the original twincam block with the 711M (?) crossflow block - a later Ford evolution. The Zetec is just a little further down the line, still Ford, still Twincam. I'm sure ACBC would have gone the same way although I do still also see the authenticity argument, after all that's why I have a +2 and not a kit car. Where to draw the line.............
I've also got the chassis part built and currently with the body on - the wheels look fine and I don't seem to have a problem with the fit within the arches. Obviously the wheel diameter is a little greater but the rolling radius of the tyres is the same as the original. Have I missed the point? Again, I suppose, Minilites are non-original although they do have a period feel - I miss the knock on spinners.
A few comments. I know a fair number have replaced the original twincam block with the 711M (?) crossflow block - a later Ford evolution. The Zetec is just a little further down the line, still Ford, still Twincam. I'm sure ACBC would have gone the same way although I do still also see the authenticity argument, after all that's why I have a +2 and not a kit car. Where to draw the line.............
I've also got the chassis part built and currently with the body on - the wheels look fine and I don't seem to have a problem with the fit within the arches. Obviously the wheel diameter is a little greater but the rolling radius of the tyres is the same as the original. Have I missed the point? Again, I suppose, Minilites are non-original although they do have a period feel - I miss the knock on spinners.
- mikealdren
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: 26 Aug 2006
I was just saying that I am not keen on the wheels right out at the extremes of the body.
Andy at Spyder has done this on purpose and I can understand his reason, I just prefer them a little more inboard.
The diameter is not an issue to me as I plan to use the knock on Minilights Spyder sell which are 14inch also. I also prefer the look of knock on spinners.
Andy at Spyder has done this on purpose and I can understand his reason, I just prefer them a little more inboard.
The diameter is not an issue to me as I plan to use the knock on Minilights Spyder sell which are 14inch also. I also prefer the look of knock on spinners.
-
SimonH - Third Gear
- Posts: 296
- Joined: 15 Sep 2004
SimonH wrote:I was just saying that I am not keen on the wheels right out at the extremes of the body.
Andy at Spyder has done this on purpose and I can understand his reason, I just prefer them a little more inboard.
The diameter is not an issue to me as I plan to use the knock on Minilights Spyder sell which are 14inch also. I also prefer the look of knock on spinners.
I'm tempted by these too, my steel rims are knackered so I was looking for some suitable "period" alloys to use and found the minilite site, classy wheels and the 14"knock ons look soooo good!
Wouldnt mind a set of revolution 4 spokes, but I doubt there are any useble ones left now. (there used to be a pale blue +2 around the Bedford area with them.
- tower of strength
- Third Gear
- Posts: 351
- Joined: 15 Mar 2005
back to the plot......
earlier in this post someone mentioned the duratec st170 engine as a better bet than the zetec.it is actually a tuned zetec,not a proper duratec! it was badged up to look different,but has an iron block and is almost the same as a later (black-top) zetec.should go in anywhere a normal zetec will go.can't comment on the mazda/ford aluminium duratec,but I am fitting the 1600 alloy zetec se (focus) engine in our plus2.should be similar power and torque to twin-cam,cost the same as a set of pistons!
Martin
earlier in this post someone mentioned the duratec st170 engine as a better bet than the zetec.it is actually a tuned zetec,not a proper duratec! it was badged up to look different,but has an iron block and is almost the same as a later (black-top) zetec.should go in anywhere a normal zetec will go.can't comment on the mazda/ford aluminium duratec,but I am fitting the 1600 alloy zetec se (focus) engine in our plus2.should be similar power and torque to twin-cam,cost the same as a set of pistons!
Martin
"He's not the messiah, he's a very naughty boy"
Monty Python's The Life Of Brian,best film ever.
Monty Python's The Life Of Brian,best film ever.
- lotusanglia1965
- Second Gear
- Posts: 109
- Joined: 19 Jul 2004
23 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests