help - crooked motor
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
i got my engine back in the other week and notice it is sitting crooked longitudinally - that is, it is pointing slightly to the right hand side of the car (drivers perspective). the whole thing is offset to the left if i measure the head to engine bay side to side, but its points diagonally to the right. I've had everything out - engine, tranny, rear end, and body off. I have the weber head with the correct differing engine mounts and the original spacers on the exhaust side.
anyone have this happen? is there some simple mistake i have done? should i loosen up the tranny and see if there is enough slop in the bolt holes to shift it some?
anyone have this happen? is there some simple mistake i have done? should i loosen up the tranny and see if there is enough slop in the bolt holes to shift it some?
- mini64
- Second Gear
- Posts: 179
- Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Spacers are 1 and 1/8 inch on the Exhaust side for the twin cam block, more like 11/16 (from memory) for a 711 block. Gearbox mount is pretty well fixed as to where it goes, not a lot of movement possible there.
If this is for a plus2 - well, never mind!
Gary
This is the sows ear just in.
If this is for a plus2 - well, never mind!
Gary
This is the sows ear just in.
-
garyeanderson - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 2626
- Joined: 12 Sep 2003
The carb side is higher and the mountings are offset. The tail housing mount is central and level. So the engine does not sit straight or level and there is a preload in the rubber mounts.... neither is the plane of the diff input straight or level.
if you have the spacers as Gary mentions all should be ok
if you have the spacers as Gary mentions all should be ok
- AHM
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: 19 Apr 2004
1.
Check that you have the engine mounts the correct way up. They are designed to still carry the weight of the engine if the rubber fails.
2. Not sure about this one, but I think the mount can be fastened to the chassis either in front or behind the fitting on the chassis. I'm not sure which is correct without going to look in my car, but is it possible that you have one in front on the chassis on one side and the other in the behind position on the other side.
3. twisted chassis ?
Check that you have the engine mounts the correct way up. They are designed to still carry the weight of the engine if the rubber fails.
2. Not sure about this one, but I think the mount can be fastened to the chassis either in front or behind the fitting on the chassis. I'm not sure which is correct without going to look in my car, but is it possible that you have one in front on the chassis on one side and the other in the behind position on the other side.
3. twisted chassis ?
Bill Williams
36/6725 S3 Coupe OGU108E Yellow over Black.
36/6725 S3 Coupe OGU108E Yellow over Black.
- billwill
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 4405
- Joined: 19 Apr 2008
OK, stupid question #1. Do you have an Elan or a +2? You have posted to "Things in Common" and I have not checked your previous posts so I am not certain. The engine mounts for a +2 are the same for both sides whether Weber or Stromberg induction. The differing mounts apply to Elans with Webers (and Dellortos?) only. Also checking engine location with respect to the body is a dangerous game. The registration of the body to the frame is a big variable and may lead you to think there is a problem with engine to frame registration when there is no problem at all in the latter context. To answer one of Bill's points, the engine mounts only mate the frame on one side of the welded frame brackets, I believe the Metalastic mounts go to the fore but I am willing to be corrected. The welded brackets on the frame are formed or "plunged" so the Metalastic mounts only mate one way.
Russ Newton
Elan +2S (1971)
Elite S2 (1962)
Elan +2S (1971)
Elite S2 (1962)
-
CBUEB1771 - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: 09 Nov 2006
Type 26 and Plus Two: the rubber mounts attached to the engine are always in front of the fixed chassis plates otherwise you have to unbolt them from the engine to get the engine out, unless I've misunderstood what you're talking about. You would only get it wrong if you put the engine in without the body fitted.
As Bill stated it's just possible you've got one mount upside down but that shouldn't push it sideways, perhaps tilt it sideway a bit. There's not enough slop in the mountings to make a visible difference by retightening and we assume you are using similar age mountings, like new, as they do settle.
Can you print a picture to help assess it?
As Bill stated it's just possible you've got one mount upside down but that shouldn't push it sideways, perhaps tilt it sideway a bit. There's not enough slop in the mountings to make a visible difference by retightening and we assume you are using similar age mountings, like new, as they do settle.
Can you print a picture to help assess it?
Meg
26/4088 1965 S1½ Old and scruffy but in perfect working order; the car too.
________________Put your money where your mouse is, click on "Support LotusElan.net" below.
26/4088 1965 S1½ Old and scruffy but in perfect working order; the car too.
________________Put your money where your mouse is, click on "Support LotusElan.net" below.
-
Quart Meg Miles - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1175
- Joined: 03 Oct 2012
Last edited by Guest on Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
garyeanderson - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 2626
- Joined: 12 Sep 2003
Did you use a different block such as 711M on rebuild?
If so, the 711M needs one side reduced by 1/2in at the motor mount on block (Ground or machined off)
James
If so, the 711M needs one side reduced by 1/2in at the motor mount on block (Ground or machined off)
James
-
holywood3645 - Fourth Gear
- Posts: 889
- Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Thanks for the help all! I forgot to mention the car was a two seater, but truthfully I didnt know it mattered. thanks in part to this forum i do have the mounts the right side up, and they are in front of the chassis mount (only cause that is the only way they'd go?!). Yes, measuring anything with respect to the body is risky, it just figures that if mine were offset the other way the headers wouldnt be so close to the foot well! how it happens, i suppose...
Gary, yours looks crooked about the same as mine so I'm not going to worry about it. I did notice though that my tranny mount is offset in the direction that would make the engine point as it does. it isnt clear in the first photo below, but the little angled sheet metal gusset on the mount is just touching the chassis on one side but on the other there is about a 1/4" clearance. In the attached photo the engine looks pretty straight, but in person it is noticeable.
Gary, yours looks crooked about the same as mine so I'm not going to worry about it. I did notice though that my tranny mount is offset in the direction that would make the engine point as it does. it isnt clear in the first photo below, but the little angled sheet metal gusset on the mount is just touching the chassis on one side but on the other there is about a 1/4" clearance. In the attached photo the engine looks pretty straight, but in person it is noticeable.
- mini64
- Second Gear
- Posts: 179
- Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Yours and mine in the same photo, the plenum bolt holes and engine location look exactly the same to me
-
garyeanderson - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 2626
- Joined: 12 Sep 2003
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: joe7 and 50 guests