Pertronix Ignitor failure.....
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
(Following on from pharriso's ignition fun, here's what I ran into over the past couple of weeks.)
I'm sure many of us are running Pertronix ignition systems and find them an utterly reliable alternative to points. Mine has been in the car for about 15 years, 10 in my ownership without ever being touched.
However, when my Elan started running very poorly a few weeks ago I decided to check the static timing and found a ten degree difference between #1 and #4 (respectively, 8 degrees BTDC, which is a bit late, and 2 degrees ATDC, which is very late). So I pulled the distributor to see what was going on.
The Pertronix ignitor uses a magnetic sensor in place of the points and a plastic sleeve with four embedded magnets that fits over the rotor shaft. The sensor detects the magnets as they spin past. On removing the sleeve I found that the magnets had detached from it and were sitting on the rotor itself. The glue that held the magnets into the sleeve had presumably failed. Due to the 2:1 crank:distributor rotation ratio a 1 degree movement in a magnet translates to a 2 degree change at the crank.
I could have tried to glue the astonishingly strong little magnets back in place but decided to replace the entire thing. The sleeve for the new unit has been updated so that the magnets are fully embedded into the plastic and cannot fall out.
So, a cautionary tale for anybody with an old Pertronix ignitor with glued-in magnets: take the sleeve off once in a while to check that they are secure. (Gluing them back in would be a fun exercise because they are powerful enough to leap together when placed in the sleeve, and you have to maintain the correct North-South polarity if the sensor is to work properly!)
Other notes:
- For a standard Lucas 23D4 distributor the correct Pertronix ignitor is a LU-148.
- For a Pertronix distributor of the type that R.D. Enterprises sells for the Twin Cam the correct Pertronix ignitor is a LU-143A. (I've not actually examined the distributor that Ray is selling today, but I'm confident that my 15 year old distributor is one of his - from the website picture it's identical.)
Nick
I'm sure many of us are running Pertronix ignition systems and find them an utterly reliable alternative to points. Mine has been in the car for about 15 years, 10 in my ownership without ever being touched.
However, when my Elan started running very poorly a few weeks ago I decided to check the static timing and found a ten degree difference between #1 and #4 (respectively, 8 degrees BTDC, which is a bit late, and 2 degrees ATDC, which is very late). So I pulled the distributor to see what was going on.
The Pertronix ignitor uses a magnetic sensor in place of the points and a plastic sleeve with four embedded magnets that fits over the rotor shaft. The sensor detects the magnets as they spin past. On removing the sleeve I found that the magnets had detached from it and were sitting on the rotor itself. The glue that held the magnets into the sleeve had presumably failed. Due to the 2:1 crank:distributor rotation ratio a 1 degree movement in a magnet translates to a 2 degree change at the crank.
I could have tried to glue the astonishingly strong little magnets back in place but decided to replace the entire thing. The sleeve for the new unit has been updated so that the magnets are fully embedded into the plastic and cannot fall out.
So, a cautionary tale for anybody with an old Pertronix ignitor with glued-in magnets: take the sleeve off once in a while to check that they are secure. (Gluing them back in would be a fun exercise because they are powerful enough to leap together when placed in the sleeve, and you have to maintain the correct North-South polarity if the sensor is to work properly!)
Other notes:
- For a standard Lucas 23D4 distributor the correct Pertronix ignitor is a LU-148.
- For a Pertronix distributor of the type that R.D. Enterprises sells for the Twin Cam the correct Pertronix ignitor is a LU-143A. (I've not actually examined the distributor that Ray is selling today, but I'm confident that my 15 year old distributor is one of his - from the website picture it's identical.)
Nick
-
elanner - Fourth Gear
- Posts: 546
- Joined: 14 Sep 2010
Exactly the same thing happened to my 18 year old Aldon Ignitor a few weeks after buying the car back last August. I fitted the Aldon version (exactly the same as the Pertronix), in 2002 when I first bought the car. I presume it had been faultless in the interim, but a week or so after buying it back last year, it started to misfire. I first thought it was a blocked carb jet, Went out in it and it misfired worse. managed to get it home on 2 cylinders, and removed the distributor cap & sleeve, and found two of the magnets had attached themselves to the distributor shaft. Glued them back in and it was back to top performance again. Bought a new sleeve from Aldon which is in the glove box.........
Current :- Elan S3 DHC SE S/S 1968,
1963 Alfa Giulia Ti Super Rep.
Previous :-
Elan S3 DHC SE SS 1968,
Elan S3 DHC S/E 1966
Elan S3 FHC Pre-Airflow 1966
1963 Alfa Giulia Ti Super Rep.
Previous :-
Elan S3 DHC SE SS 1968,
Elan S3 DHC S/E 1966
Elan S3 FHC Pre-Airflow 1966
- elans3
- Fourth Gear
- Posts: 522
- Joined: 12 Sep 2003
I’ve been investigating why my no 2 spark plug is not sparking, so only running on 3 cylinders.
On checking the Aldon (Petronix) sleeve one of the magnets was attached to the shaft, per previous discussion.
But there is only one magnet left in the sleeve, and I understand there should be 4! Can’t see any sign of another 2 magnets.
Can’t understand how the engine is running at all.
Guess I need a replacement but intrigued as to how the remaining magnet is providing some function.
Any thoughts?
Richard
On checking the Aldon (Petronix) sleeve one of the magnets was attached to the shaft, per previous discussion.
But there is only one magnet left in the sleeve, and I understand there should be 4! Can’t see any sign of another 2 magnets.
Can’t understand how the engine is running at all.
Guess I need a replacement but intrigued as to how the remaining magnet is providing some function.
Any thoughts?
Richard
Lotus Elan Sprint FHC 1973
-
RichardS - Third Gear
- Posts: 489
- Joined: 23 Apr 2007
On further investigation have found the other 2 magnets lurking down the shaft, so should be able to glue them back in. Aldon are out of stock of the replacement at the moment.
I guess 1 must have detached to cause the missing spark, and the other 2 must have detached when I removed the collar.
Richard
I guess 1 must have detached to cause the missing spark, and the other 2 must have detached when I removed the collar.
Richard
Lotus Elan Sprint FHC 1973
-
RichardS - Third Gear
- Posts: 489
- Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Thanks Nick for your original post pointing me in the right direction. Always satisfying to sort out even fairly minor issues and great when you the engine fires first time again on 4 cylinders!
I did consider sticking the magnets back. A helpful gent at Aldon suggested epoxying them in as a temporary measure. If you do this a useful tip is to get a paper clip and the side of the magnet that is attracted is the side that faces inwards. Would probably be fine, but I decided for peace of mind to replace with the newer enclosed version to prevent a further mishap.
Richard
I did consider sticking the magnets back. A helpful gent at Aldon suggested epoxying them in as a temporary measure. If you do this a useful tip is to get a paper clip and the side of the magnet that is attracted is the side that faces inwards. Would probably be fine, but I decided for peace of mind to replace with the newer enclosed version to prevent a further mishap.
Richard
Lotus Elan Sprint FHC 1973
-
RichardS - Third Gear
- Posts: 489
- Joined: 23 Apr 2007
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests