Elan starters

PostPost by: JKING » Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:44 am

Does anyone have any experience with or opinion of the "High Performance Starters" that R D Enterprises is selling for the Elan?
John
63 Elan 260146
JKING
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 59
Joined: 22 May 2004

PostPost by: chicagojeff » Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:19 am

They are awesome. I bought one from RD. I have written in the forum before that they are 10,000 times better than the original, and are even more in keeping with Chapman philosophy, because they are much lighter.

the only trick is whether you use the solenoid on the starter, or bypass it to use the one on the firewall. I did the latter, because I like the push-button remote on the firewall for starting while doing engine work.

good luck. jeff

p.s. one other trick: getting the top bolt attached is hard; you need to use a really long extension on the socket set to reach it from the front. It is not impossible, but takes some fiddling.
67 S3 DHC
chicagojeff
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 163
Joined: 22 Apr 2005

PostPost by: DJThom » Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:44 pm

I have had no problem with the original and my engine is a higher compression setup than most S2 at about 10.5:1.

It did need some repairs inside as the internal connection had come apart and required silver solder. Initially, the starter did not have enough power to turn the engine fast enough to start. After the repair, it's been more than adequate.

The added lightness argument can't be denied when looking at a new unit
'66 Lotus Elan S2 Roadster RHD
DJThom
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 143
Joined: 21 Oct 2004

PostPost by: JKING » Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:26 pm

Thanks guys.
That top bolt is a tough one on the original starter too as you no doubt know, Jeff. It's tough to even see it and in doing it by feel, it's easy to get on the nearby bell housing bolt.
I think I will take a cue from your comment, DJT, and open my starter up and check the input power post connection. I have just finished rebuilding my engine with new sleeves, rings, bearings etc. The starter spins it reasonably well with the plugs removed but really struggles with them in place. I checked the stall torque of the starter and it was consistent with the spec in the manual, i.e. about 7.5 to 8 ft-lb. With a nine tooth starter gear and 110 (I think) tooth ring gear this should produce about 92 to 99 ft-lb on the crank. I measured the torque required to just move the crank with a torque wrench as 19 ft-lb at TDC and 34 ft-lb at TDC + 90 degrees. This was before I ran the engine. After about a five minute run the TDC value reduced to about 10 ft-lb.
After I check that post, if it still struggles with the plugs in I'll try the RDEnt starter.
John
63 Elan 260146
JKING
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 59
Joined: 22 May 2004

PostPost by: 1964 S1 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:37 pm

I too bought that starter from rdent and it works great. My +2 had one on it when I bought that car and it convinced me to put one on the S1, Now I'm wondering if I can use a smaller battery.....
1964 S1
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: 15 Sep 2003

PostPost by: RotoFlexible » Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:35 pm

JKING wrote:Thanks guys.
That top bolt is a tough one on the original starter too as you no doubt know, Jeff. It's tough to even see it and in doing it by feel, it's easy to get on the nearby bell housing bolt.


My first starter failure occurred within days of bringing the car home from the PO in 1967. I was 16 and hardly knew one end of a ratchet wrench from the other. That first removal took hours. After many years of practice and experimentation, I can do it in minutes. I use the long extension, a U-joint, and the socket. I wrap the U-joint with electrical tape to stiffen it a bit. When replacing the bolt, I wrap a layer of tape around the bolt head and lockwasher so I can place the bolt using the extension, rather than by hand.

Most of my many starter problems have involved the bendix jamming in the ring gear, chewed up ring gears etc. - not the starter itself. I've just fitted the Gustafson starter (sold by rdent and others) but haven't tried it on the road yet. It worked fine on the dyno.
Andrew Bodge
'66 Elan S2 26/4869
I love the sound of a torque wrench in the morning. Sounds like... progress.
User avatar
RotoFlexible
Fourth Gear
Fourth Gear
 
Posts: 624
Joined: 01 Sep 2005

PostPost by: Frank Howard » Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:46 pm

DJThom wrote:The added lightness argument can't be denied when looking at a new unit

Besides this and the added reliability, there's another advantage that should be considered. When you energize the stock Lucas starter, the spinning motion is turned into inertia that throws the spinning pinion into the stationary ring gear thus causing wear on the teeth. The pre-engaged starter engages the pinion with the ring gear before it starts to spin, so the stationary pinion engages with the stationary ring gear causing much less wear on the teeth.

Believe me, if your dentist owned an Elan, he would upgrade to the pre-engaged starter. :wink:
Frank Howard
'71 S4 SE
Minnesota
Frank Howard
Fourth Gear
Fourth Gear
 
Posts: 919
Joined: 30 Mar 2004

PostPost by: Chrisrich » Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:53 pm

add me to the list of the happy RD Ent/starter upgrade customers.
1970 Elan S4 DHC 45/9780 1972 Triumph TR6
1958 Bugeye Sprite 1967 Triumph Trophy 650
1991 Ducati 900ss 1989 Honda GB500
Chrisrich
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 112
Joined: 12 Jul 2007

PostPost by: chicagojeff » Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:33 pm

I'll throw in there that I now use an Odyssey 680 battery, which is about the size of a motorcycle battery. plenty of power for the gear reduction starter. And, as some of you note, the whole thing saves wear since it pre-engages the ring gear. No more Ouch!
67 S3 DHC
chicagojeff
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 163
Joined: 22 Apr 2005

PostPost by: elancoupe » Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:59 pm

I have been using one of these starters for 23 years now. I have never had any issues, it's been worth every penny. :D
Mike
elancoupe
Fourth Gear
Fourth Gear
 
Posts: 759
Joined: 11 Sep 2003

PostPost by: garyeanderson » Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:13 pm

1700cc twincam, 20/50 oil, Kieth's starter, and a garden tractor battery, it starts at 30 degrees F. without problems. The electric fuel pump helps filling the webers before it starts cranking. 3 full pumps of the throttle and a 4 of just cracking the throttle open, when it fires, a couple blips on the throttle and as many as nessessary to keep it running and go...
The first battery lasted 7 years, the next was dead in a year and the third is going on 2 years. all three were bought at Napa for $20 a battery. It has started at temps (probably not as reliably) as cold as 20 degrees F. but theres no top, windows, heater, insulation so anything that cold doesn't interest me much.

Gary
Attachments
P1140480.jpg and
P1140479.jpg and
Last edited by garyeanderson on Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
garyeanderson
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 2626
Joined: 12 Sep 2003

PostPost by: type36lotus » Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:46 am

The RDENT way and I am one of those keep it original type.
Mike Geiger
66 S3 Coupe', no more :-(
User avatar
type36lotus
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 275
Joined: 17 Sep 2003

PostPost by: JKING » Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:23 pm

Just for the record, I bought the RDEnt starter and it seems to have solved all of my present starter problems. Installation was no worse than for the Lucas starter which isn't really all that bad. It spins the engine just fine and seems to be a lot less traumatic when engaging. Thanks all for the comments.
John
63 Elan 260146
JKING
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 59
Joined: 22 May 2004

PostPost by: Frank Howard » Fri Feb 01, 2008 4:30 pm

garyeanderson wrote:1700cc twincam, 20/50 oil, Kieth's starter, and a garden tractor battery, it starts at 30 degrees F. without problems.

Gary,

You are ahead of your time. Because Elises and Exiges come with Japanese gear reduction starters, there is a company that is manufacturing a special battery bracket for these cars. This bracket will hold a smaller battery so that owners can save weight and space by swapping out their conventional batteries for garden tractor batteries.

Japanese gear reduction starters are what Lotus would have equipped the Elan with had they been available to bolt straight on to the Ford bell housing at the time. The proof is in the Elise/Exige.
Frank Howard
'71 S4 SE
Minnesota
Frank Howard
Fourth Gear
Fourth Gear
 
Posts: 919
Joined: 30 Mar 2004

Total Online:

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests