diff ratio?
22 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
maybe for you, bill!! knowing me, I'd lose count and keep having to start over
what happens if one is hidden behind a lorry?
how accurate were they put in in the first place?
also, is it not illegal to drive with one finger on a stopwatch?!!!
think I'll stick with GPS.........
fred
what happens if one is hidden behind a lorry?
how accurate were they put in in the first place?
also, is it not illegal to drive with one finger on a stopwatch?!!!
think I'll stick with GPS.........
fred
'Never give up!....unless it's hopeless.....'
1970 S4 dhc big valve
1973 Ginetta G15
1967 Ginetta G4 [sadly now sold]
1959 lotus elite type 14
1970 S4 dhc big valve
1973 Ginetta G15
1967 Ginetta G4 [sadly now sold]
1959 lotus elite type 14
- Elanconvert
- Third Gear
- Posts: 344
- Joined: 26 Jul 2013
My S2 SE 26/5327 had a 3.55:1 when I bought it used over 30 years ago. My parts book shows part number 026 R 0703A for the 3.55:1 crown wheel and pinion, clearly a pre S3 part number. The 3.9:1 also shows as a pre S3 part, the 3.77:1 does not.
Bill
Bill
- bill308
- Fourth Gear
- Posts: 736
- Joined: 27 May 2004
Interesting to learn of the early vehicles being fitted with a 3.54 diff ratio, was it specially made for Lotus as I cant think of any Ford production vehicles of the time that could have handled such tall gearing, maybe something with little wheels
Corsair V4 perhaps?
Corsair V4 perhaps?
- Chancer
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: 20 Mar 2012
The Workshop Manual October 1972 describes the 3.9 as being 43:9 (which should, of course, read 43:11). Mine is actually 39:10 so was 43:11 ever produced, it is just 0.23% different in ratio?
Meg
26/4088 1965 S1½ Old and scruffy but in perfect working order; the car too.
________________Put your money where your mouse is, click on "Support LotusElan.net" below.
26/4088 1965 S1½ Old and scruffy but in perfect working order; the car too.
________________Put your money where your mouse is, click on "Support LotusElan.net" below.
-
Quart Meg Miles - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: 03 Oct 2012
The 3.556 differential ratio was 9:32. Lotus "homologated" a 3.44 differential ratio 9:31, but it does not seem to have made an appearance.
A 11:43 would be 3.91, close to the regular 3.9 ratio. You might look at the Sierra differential gears to see if such a combination is available, or could be put together.
The larger gears in the 11:43 might offer slightly less friction losses than the smaller 10:39, but probably not enough to be noticeable. If you are interested in friction reduction, have the ring and pinion REM treated, which is now widely available and not too costly. For even greater friction reduction, RF85 is available, but is quite a bit pricier.
The 3.55 ratio (9:32) was introduced fairly early on, probably in reaction to drivers taking out the rev limiter and driving their cars at 7500+ on the Autobahn. Even with the 3.55 ratio, the FHC would still get to 7000. The later 3.54 was 11:39.
David
1968 36/7988 with CR trans and 3.55
A 11:43 would be 3.91, close to the regular 3.9 ratio. You might look at the Sierra differential gears to see if such a combination is available, or could be put together.
The larger gears in the 11:43 might offer slightly less friction losses than the smaller 10:39, but probably not enough to be noticeable. If you are interested in friction reduction, have the ring and pinion REM treated, which is now widely available and not too costly. For even greater friction reduction, RF85 is available, but is quite a bit pricier.
The 3.55 ratio (9:32) was introduced fairly early on, probably in reaction to drivers taking out the rev limiter and driving their cars at 7500+ on the Autobahn. Even with the 3.55 ratio, the FHC would still get to 7000. The later 3.54 was 11:39.
David
1968 36/7988 with CR trans and 3.55
-
msd1107 - Fourth Gear
- Posts: 770
- Joined: 24 Sep 2003
22 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests