Elan FHC Coat Hooks...Under or Aft???
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
I have an S3 SE FHC. My car came to me without coat hooks, so I thought I would add them back.
I have seen references to two different placements, so I'm confused which is correct.
Brian ('types26/36') has photos that show the hook underneath the courtesy light whereas 'Cal44' has uploaded photos that show the hook aft of the light!!
vs.
Can they both be right?
My quarter panel did have two holes, which could well be the fixing holes, below the light.
Any one know the answer to this?
my car is a type 36 (36/7512)
Cheers
Paul.
I have seen references to two different placements, so I'm confused which is correct.
Brian ('types26/36') has photos that show the hook underneath the courtesy light whereas 'Cal44' has uploaded photos that show the hook aft of the light!!
vs.
Can they both be right?
My quarter panel did have two holes, which could well be the fixing holes, below the light.
Any one know the answer to this?
my car is a type 36 (36/7512)
Cheers
Paul.
Paul Carew
Austin,Texas,USA
1967 Lotus Elan S3SE Right Hand Drive, FHC 36/7152 BOO 758F
Austin,Texas,USA
1967 Lotus Elan S3SE Right Hand Drive, FHC 36/7152 BOO 758F
-
pcarew - Second Gear
- Posts: 177
- Joined: 30 Nov 2005
I think both are correct. I think that early cars (65' to say 67') had them behind and afterwards late S3 & S4 FHCs had them below. As with all things Lotus, who knows when there was a changeover? I think they look nicer with the hooks below but that is just my take on it.
A
A
- Pastapesto
- Third Gear
- Posts: 271
- Joined: 12 Nov 2006
Paul,
The picture you have is of my Sprint, here is a picture of my old 67 S3SE SS with the seat belt hung on the hook, I dont know if the earlier cars had them aft but I agree that it looks better below the int light (just my opinion of course)
The picture you have is of my Sprint, here is a picture of my old 67 S3SE SS with the seat belt hung on the hook, I dont know if the earlier cars had them aft but I agree that it looks better below the int light (just my opinion of course)
Brian
64 S2 Roadster
72 Sprint FHC
64 S2 Roadster
72 Sprint FHC
-
types26/36 - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 3403
- Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Thanks everyone for shedding some light on this. Talk about a quick response. Terrific
As my quarter panel board had holes underneath the headliner fabric below the light, I'm going to go with that.
Cheers
Paul
As my quarter panel board had holes underneath the headliner fabric below the light, I'm going to go with that.
Cheers
Paul
Paul Carew
Austin,Texas,USA
1967 Lotus Elan S3SE Right Hand Drive, FHC 36/7152 BOO 758F
Austin,Texas,USA
1967 Lotus Elan S3SE Right Hand Drive, FHC 36/7152 BOO 758F
-
pcarew - Second Gear
- Posts: 177
- Joined: 30 Nov 2005
My car, a 1968 S4 has the hook beneath the light, I also think it is for the seat belt rather tan a coat.
Richard Hawkins
Richard Hawkins
- RichardHawkins
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Another point is that the hooks are attached (on my S3 at least) by screws which pass through the trim panel and into rivnuts in the body, and so help to support the panel. These rivnuts in the body should show the original position of the hook and can be seen in the middle of the picture below
- NickD
- First Gear
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 13 Sep 2003
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests