Buick/Olds/Rover 3.5 V8

PostPost by: 96 Gears » Tue Aug 08, 2023 7:34 pm

Greetings to all...
This is "new guy" Bill Geary from Clarks Summit, Pa. USA.
I'm quite excited to join this forum. I recently bought a very special car. It's one of those beautiful cars that have been on my Wish List for more than 50 years!
It's a 1971 Lotus Elan +2 S. Build date 12/70. Body 00091-N.
Before anyone gets too excited, the seller only had the body shell for sale. It appears to be completely original, down to the early 70s strange Pumpkin Orange paint. It doesn't even have a Chassis under it!!
No front or rear glass either. Both doors do have glass tho.
No interior, except for a British dash which is very weathered. I hope to save most of the Smiths gauges?
Since I'm basically starting from scratch, I've pretty much decided to build my "Dream Car". This will be powered by either an early 60s BOP all-alum 3.5 V8, or the more modern Rover variant from the 80s-90s?
I hope to use the excellent 5-speed manual trans from the TR7 or TR8?
My first question is, may I use the Spyder chassis for this project? If so, I wonder if they will agree to modifying their current frame for the +2 to accept the V8??
I realize I will be de-valuing this little beauty but I have no intention of ever selling it! It's something I've wanted to do ever since I owned a 1970 Opel GT back in '72-'74!!

So there you have it. This is my first foray into the world of Lotus ownership. I look forward to hearing from anyone who's had experience doing such a big project?

Best regards to all,
96 Gears
Bill Geary
Attachments
Resized_20230723_200134(1).jpeg and
96 Gears
New-tral
 
Posts: 5
Joined: 08 Aug 2023

PostPost by: Sadbrewer » Tue Aug 08, 2023 11:25 pm

Find a Lotus engine Bill and buy a proper Lotus chassis (no offence to Spyder and it's quality products btw, this would be purely my preference)...fitting a big heavy lump up front is a serious mistake, you will ruin the car and lose any investment you have in it. Don't imagine that a 1600 cc engine in this car is a major manufacturers base model...this is a sweet, sweet car, you will not improve it by shoehorning a heavier,albeit more powerful engine into it, ... Chapman and his team knew what they were doing, had it required a large engine to get the best all round performance they would have done it...Lotus are all about balance and handling, weight distribution is critical, if you lose that they would be no better than an MG C or a Sunbeam Tiger...OK in a straight line, can't go round a corner...like any front heavy car. Watch Jay Leno's video on his Elan...handling is the key....just follow Chapman's Lotus ( World Champion Car Constructor's) ethos. My worry is that you will accidentally turn an extremely good car into a dog.
Last edited by Sadbrewer on Wed Aug 09, 2023 12:18 am, edited 9 times in total.
Sadbrewer
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 106
Joined: 31 May 2021

PostPost by: 2cams70 » Tue Aug 08, 2023 11:42 pm

A good modern 4 or even 3 cylinder engine should slot in without a lot of hacking around of the chassis. Will make mince meat of an old 3.5L Rover V8. Key is not do do anything that isn't easily reversible should you wish to use a proper Lotus engine. I'm currently driving around in a modern car with a 3 cylinder 200HP engine - boy things have come a long way. Cubic inches are only for dinosaurs !!
1970 Ford Escort Twin Cam
1972 Ford Escort GT1600 Twin Cam
1980 Ford Escort 2.0 Ghia
Peugeot 505 GTI Wagons (5spdx1) (Autox1)
2022 Ford Fiesta ST.
2cams70
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 2160
Joined: 10 Jun 2015

PostPost by: bitsobrits » Wed Aug 09, 2023 1:18 am

To install even a 'lightweight' v-8 in that car would require a very custom and much more substantial chassis, beefier suspension, etc, all massively increasing weight and absolutely destroying the beautifully balanced dynamics of the car. You'd end up with a pretty but otherwise highly compromised 'kit car'. So much for 'simplify and add lightness'.

But it's your car. Carry on as you wish.
Steve

Elan S1 1963-Bourne bodied
Elan S3 1967 FHC pre airflow

Formerly:
Elan S1 1964
Elan S3 1966 FHC pre airflow
Elan S3 1967 FHC airflow
Elan S4 1969 FHC
Europa S2 1970
Esprit S2 1979
bitsobrits
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 417
Joined: 27 Apr 2011

PostPost by: snowyelan » Wed Aug 09, 2023 1:29 am

Something to get you started.
viewtopic.php?f=39&t=27803&start=
Scott
45/9011
Hawkestone, On, Ca
snowyelan
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 444
Joined: 14 Sep 2003

PostPost by: Lotus 50 » Wed Aug 09, 2023 8:10 pm

How wide is the Rover V8?

If you just want more power, it would be simpler to go the Zetec route. https://www.spydercars.co.uk/lotus-elan ... -products/
Lotus 50
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 127
Joined: 07 Jan 2012

PostPost by: berni29 » Wed Aug 09, 2023 9:07 pm

Hi

Welcome.

If you want something modern that will just run and be fun, then the Zetec 2.0 is the way to go. The issue with the V8 engines is that they will probably be too physically big. Quite apart from heavy as has been pointed out above.

If you have time on your hand and money is not an issue then anything is possible, but with the Zetec's at least the hard work had been done by others. Plus the engines themselves are in the spirit of the originals.

All the best

Berni
Zetec+ 2 under const, also 130S. And another 130S for complete restoration. Previously Racing green +2s with green tints. Yellow +2 and a couple of others, all missed. Great to be back 04/11/2021 although its all starting to get a bit out of control.
User avatar
berni29
Fourth Gear
Fourth Gear
 
Posts: 821
Joined: 10 Mar 2004

PostPost by: elan66 » Wed Aug 09, 2023 10:21 pm

Agree with Berni, zetec route tried and tested, Spyder chassis better bet,
If you want originality that's great but I think a lot of people who drove a zetec Vs twin cam would choose the zetec, I think the plus2 should have gotten the BDA/BDG engines,
elan66
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 161
Joined: 01 Jun 2011

PostPost by: Sadbrewer » Wed Aug 09, 2023 11:07 pm

elan66 wrote:Agree with Berni, zetec route tried and tested, Spyder chassis better bet,
If you want originality that's great but I think a lot of people who drove a zetec Vs twin cam would choose the zetec, I think the plus2 should have gotten the BDA/BDG engines,



The plus 2 was on the market before the engines you specify AFAIK.
Sadbrewer
Second Gear
Second Gear
 
Posts: 106
Joined: 31 May 2021

PostPost by: elansprint » Thu Aug 10, 2023 7:31 pm

Honda K20 would be a cracking engine easy 200bhp and 9000 rpm
Ian
elansprint
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 431
Joined: 12 Sep 2003

PostPost by: The Veg » Fri Aug 11, 2023 2:22 am

Lotus 50 wrote:How wide is the Rover V8?


This could be a real problem. Bill, have you had a chance to looks at a complete Plus 2 in the flesh? The chassis doesn't have much room for more than an inline 4:

Image

Image

Which is not to say that a small V can't fit, but the amount of modification of both the chassis and the body that would be required to make it work might be more than you really want to take on. I'm not saying don't do it, just be aware of what you're up against here.

The weight arguments are pretty valid too. The Buick/Rover V8 out-weighs the Lotus Twin Cam by more than 100 lbs. so in addition to all the chassis/body modifications, you'll need to make some changes to the suspension too.

All this is not impossible but whether or not its worth the effort is the question you'll need to put a lot of thought into.
1970 Elan Plus 2 (not S) 50/2036
2012 BMW R1200GS
"It just wouldn't be a complete day if I didn't forget something!" -Me
User avatar
The Veg
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 2185
Joined: 16 Nov 2015

PostPost by: 96 Gears » Fri Aug 11, 2023 4:21 pm

Can someone please post the "all inclusive weight" of the complete Lotus engine and trans?
I think this will be very useful information to many of us!

Thanks very much,
Bill Geary
96 Gears
New-tral
 
Posts: 5
Joined: 08 Aug 2023

PostPost by: The Veg » Fri Aug 11, 2023 6:38 pm

96 Gears wrote:Can someone please post the "all inclusive weight" of the complete Lotus engine and trans?
I think this will be very useful information to many of us!


I searched this site to inform my reply and around 230 lbs for the engine was the best figure I saw, based on one chap actually weighing his. No idea about the transmission but it's north of 100 lbs and I can grunt it off the ground and carry it SHORT distances. The search function seems to be malfunctioning at the moment so I can't find any threads addressing this.
1970 Elan Plus 2 (not S) 50/2036
2012 BMW R1200GS
"It just wouldn't be a complete day if I didn't forget something!" -Me
User avatar
The Veg
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 2185
Joined: 16 Nov 2015

PostPost by: bigvalvehead » Wed Aug 16, 2023 5:57 pm

honda6.jpg
honda6.jpg (79.62 KiB) Viewed 5704 times
Honda into Elan will go!!
Attachments
honda9.jpg
honda9.jpg (81.87 KiB) Viewed 5704 times
honda3.JPG and
honda7.jpg
honda7.jpg (73.67 KiB) Viewed 5704 times
Dave Hughes
S2 26R
Elan DHC Sprint
Shapecraft Honda powered S1(in progress)
Turbocharged 26R clone (also in progress)
Evora 400 development car ex Lotus Factory
User avatar
bigvalvehead
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 394
Joined: 11 Sep 2003

PostPost by: StressCraxx » Wed Aug 16, 2023 6:44 pm

Twincam, fully dressed with generator, carbs, manifold is 265lbs. Transmission is 85 lbs.
There is no cure for Lotus, only treatment.
User avatar
StressCraxx
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: 26 Sep 2003
Next

Total Online:

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests