Page 1 of 1
New take on plus two aerodynamics
Posted:
Mon Mar 20, 2017 4:01 pm
by JimE
Re: New take on plus two aerodynamics
Posted:
Mon Mar 20, 2017 4:19 pm
by KevJ+2
Warning light fetish
Re: New take on plus two aerodynamics
Posted:
Mon Mar 20, 2017 4:35 pm
by theelanman
mmmm......flick switches too.......
looks tidy.........going to take some work to put right tho
not sure whats happened to the centre consol.......seems to have lost the 'tray' round the gear stick....
probably full of wires for the switches and warning lights.......
Re: New take on plus two aerodynamics
Posted:
Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:44 pm
by Robbie693
But it has got an original rear bumper...!
Re: New take on plus two aerodynamics
Posted:
Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:47 am
by theelanman
in fact VWW plate.......I think its come from the same place a Cleggies
Re: New take on plus two aerodynamics
Posted:
Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:58 am
by rgh0
Not how I would have done it but looks nice underneath compared to lots of UK cars with everything rusted
cheers
Rohan
Re: New take on plus two aerodynamics
Posted:
Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:09 pm
by john.p.clegg
Yes,same place...Worcester, same year..1968...Just not as pretty and 3 grand dearer..
John
Re: New take on plus two aerodynamics
Posted:
Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:21 pm
by tedtaylor
is it my imagination, or is picture #7, #10, and #12 the same front wheel backing???
Re: New take on plus two aerodynamics
Posted:
Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:34 pm
by pharriso
Ugh...
Re: New take on plus two aerodynamics
Posted:
Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:37 pm
by john.p.clegg
tedtaylor wrote:is it my imagination, or is picture #7, #10, and #12 the same front wheel backing???
Correct,maybe it only has one working wheel??
John
Re: New take on plus two aerodynamics
Posted:
Fri Mar 24, 2017 11:23 pm
by Quart Meg Miles
pharriso wrote:Ugh...
I feel physically sick
Re: New take on plus two aerodynamics
Posted:
Sat Mar 25, 2017 6:17 pm
by jeff jackson
It's horrible.
Why would you want to do that stuff? It will take a lot of money and time to take that sh!te off and put it back to how it should be. IMHO of course.
Jeff 72 +2
Re: New take on plus two aerodynamics
Posted:
Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:05 am
by JJDraper
I've seen worse. Nothing that can't (relatively) easily be undone. May be an original bumper, but what's underneath that number plate light arrangement?
Everyone has taste, some more than others. I can't throw stones, with a roof which is more Southend than South Norfolk.
Jeremy
Re: New take on plus two aerodynamics
Posted:
Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:41 pm
by Eric the Viking
Yuk is all I can think of to say...........