I'm more than a little mystified that continued operation of an engine more than 40 degrees C over its design operating temperature is considered by anyone as the fault of the coolant. Does the coolant note safe running far beyond design limits as a product feature? Does it recommend ignoring pegged temperature gauges and pressing on simply because the radiator isn't boiling over and removing the coolant from the system?
The product appears to have trade-offs, but from what is presented here I'd say it seems to do just what it represents it does. And making assumptions that it does something else, like raising the melting temperature of aluminum alloy or the boiling point of gasoline, is on the assumer, not on the product.

Maybe it's because I grew up in the period of the Vega, but I'd never consider continued running of an aluminum block, head, or combination above 100 degrees C regardless of whether it had water, Evans, motor oil, or single malt in the radiator.
Google Evans Coolant as I just did and you'll find a Jay Leno's Garage on the product, featuring the product manager. Jay has been using it sixteen years at the time of the video, and most of his cars are worth a lot more than Elans. The PM does note that there is a difference between water mix and Evans in heat transfer, implying higher general operating temperatures. He also notes there are three blends and the product, unlike anti-freeze, is non-toxic.