Rear lifting beam
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
For years I lifted at the rear frame using a piece of channel aluminum about 5.5 inches wide by 3 inches deep by 10 inches long to straddle around the exhaust. This worked fine but allowed the suspension to droop and I've been looking for a better means to lift the wheels at the same time. I recently put this lift beam together inspired by descriptions of wooden lifts from this site.
The main cross beam is rectangular box 3 x 1.5 x 40 inches. I've bolted on a couple angles to fit within the rear frame flanges. The outer suspension tubes are picked up by a couple acetal v-blocks which are allowed to pivot slightly to match the width across the tubes. There is a vertical pin which mates to the trolley jack and a horizontal cross pin which bears the weight and allows the main beam to rotate to accommodate the varying angle of the frame and suspension as it is lifted.
It works pretty well for the couple times I've used it, it's pretty solid. I still need to run the rear wheels up on blocks to get enough clearance to roll the trolley and lift under. Once lifted I can fit a jack stand under each end for better support. It won't allow too much suspension work but for all other under car work I think I'm going to like it. Even with the Rotoflexes the wheels turn nice and smooth.
Of course, any efforts inspired by this are at your own risk. Any suggestions, comments, warnings or questions are welcomed. Just thought I'd share.
The main cross beam is rectangular box 3 x 1.5 x 40 inches. I've bolted on a couple angles to fit within the rear frame flanges. The outer suspension tubes are picked up by a couple acetal v-blocks which are allowed to pivot slightly to match the width across the tubes. There is a vertical pin which mates to the trolley jack and a horizontal cross pin which bears the weight and allows the main beam to rotate to accommodate the varying angle of the frame and suspension as it is lifted.
It works pretty well for the couple times I've used it, it's pretty solid. I still need to run the rear wheels up on blocks to get enough clearance to roll the trolley and lift under. Once lifted I can fit a jack stand under each end for better support. It won't allow too much suspension work but for all other under car work I think I'm going to like it. Even with the Rotoflexes the wheels turn nice and smooth.
Of course, any efforts inspired by this are at your own risk. Any suggestions, comments, warnings or questions are welcomed. Just thought I'd share.
Alex
45/8236
Redwood City, CA
45/8236
Redwood City, CA
-
Yum-yum - Second Gear
- Posts: 57
- Joined: 25 Mar 2008
One of the main requirements is that it mustn't twist sideways, dropping the car about 3 inches or so or more if it falls off the jack, you seem to have made sure of preventing this by having quite a long portion in contact with the centre of the car chassis. Well done that man...
Bill Williams
36/6725 S3 Coupe OGU108E Yellow over Black.
36/6725 S3 Coupe OGU108E Yellow over Black.
- billwill
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 4417
- Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Hello Alex,
could you please give us more pictures of the lifting beam, to have a better view of it ?
Guillermo
could you please give us more pictures of the lifting beam, to have a better view of it ?
Guillermo
1964 S1 (all bits at home now)
1967 S3 DHC
1969 S4 FHC
https://theelanman.com for details on Brian Bucklands book.
https://shop.lotus-books.com for more Lotus related books.
We ship worldwide. PM/Email me.
1967 S3 DHC
1969 S4 FHC
https://theelanman.com for details on Brian Bucklands book.
https://shop.lotus-books.com for more Lotus related books.
We ship worldwide. PM/Email me.
- gherlt
- Third Gear
- Posts: 484
- Joined: 20 Jul 2006
That looks a good, I like the idea of supporting the wishbones as it lifts. It's certainly a more engineered solution than my wooden block arrangement. Are there two acetal supports at either end or just one ? A photo of just the beam itself in plan view would be helpful.
Brian
Brian
-
UAB807F - Fourth Gear
- Posts: 604
- Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Thanks for the comments.
The beam can not fall off the jack as the vertical pin sits (albeit a loose fit) in a receiver hole in the jack. I was thinking of using hardwood for the v-blocks (one at each end, about 6 inches long) but I found the acetal cheap at the local salvage lot. Total materials is about $50 USD.
Here's a top view:
And an underside view:
The beam can not fall off the jack as the vertical pin sits (albeit a loose fit) in a receiver hole in the jack. I was thinking of using hardwood for the v-blocks (one at each end, about 6 inches long) but I found the acetal cheap at the local salvage lot. Total materials is about $50 USD.
Here's a top view:
And an underside view:
Alex
45/8236
Redwood City, CA
45/8236
Redwood City, CA
-
Yum-yum - Second Gear
- Posts: 57
- Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Hi Alex,
What is the wall thickness of the main support tube? I have a long length of the same size tubing left over from a railing project around a deck that I am just completing. Was wondering what I was going to do with the excess. Never seems to fail, that left over material seems to find a use for itself.
Rob Walker
26-4889
What is the wall thickness of the main support tube? I have a long length of the same size tubing left over from a railing project around a deck that I am just completing. Was wondering what I was going to do with the excess. Never seems to fail, that left over material seems to find a use for itself.
Rob Walker
26-4889
Rob Walker
26-4889
50-0315N
1964 Sabra GT
1964 Elva Mk4T Coupe (awaiting restoration)
1965 Ford Falcon Ranchero, 302,AOD,9",rack and pinion,disc,etc,etc,etc
1954 Nash Healey LeMans Coupe
Owning a Lotus will get you off the couch
26-4889
50-0315N
1964 Sabra GT
1964 Elva Mk4T Coupe (awaiting restoration)
1965 Ford Falcon Ranchero, 302,AOD,9",rack and pinion,disc,etc,etc,etc
1954 Nash Healey LeMans Coupe
Owning a Lotus will get you off the couch
- prezoom
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1178
- Joined: 16 Mar 2009
Hi Rob,
It is eighth inch (=.120") thick web. The same section is available thicker web, but I don't think it is necessary and it is already getting heavy. The beam does not noticeably deflect under load.
I had originally thought to use a flat steel bar, maybe 4" wide by 0.5" thick. This would keep the height profile down and maybe allow getting the trolley/lift under the frame without driving up on blocks. But this would mean having to weld on bearing supports for the v-blocks.
I would make sure the tube you want to use is structural and not decorative.
Alex
It is eighth inch (=.120") thick web. The same section is available thicker web, but I don't think it is necessary and it is already getting heavy. The beam does not noticeably deflect under load.
I had originally thought to use a flat steel bar, maybe 4" wide by 0.5" thick. This would keep the height profile down and maybe allow getting the trolley/lift under the frame without driving up on blocks. But this would mean having to weld on bearing supports for the v-blocks.
I would make sure the tube you want to use is structural and not decorative.
Alex
-
Yum-yum - Second Gear
- Posts: 57
- Joined: 25 Mar 2008
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests