Mystery Hole On Top Of Tunnel.....
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
So I removed the center console piece in order to replace the boot at the base of the shift lever, and discovered an aluminum plate which covers an opening cut into the top of the chassis, over the drive/prop shaft.....it is large enough to get one's hand in there, but not sure why access would be needed there.....perhaps help in drive/prop shaft remove/install?......any thoughts?.....
1966 S3 DHC
45/6261
45/6261
-
ajwheels - Second Gear
- Posts: 65
- Joined: 06 Feb 2020
you California people, drug stash of course. kidding
likely easier than removing starboard seat for greasing etc U joint?
likely easier than removing starboard seat for greasing etc U joint?
Born, and brought home from the hospital (no seat belt (wtf)) in a baby!
Find out where the limits are, and start from there
Love your Mother
Earth
Find out where the limits are, and start from there
Love your Mother
Earth
-
h20hamelan - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Spyder Zetec cars have a handbrake fitted there, has someone tried this?
- mikealdren
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 1194
- Joined: 26 Aug 2006
Hi AJ,
likely it's had a different gearbox with a shift extension in there, do you have any history on the car?
Regards
Iain
likely it's had a different gearbox with a shift extension in there, do you have any history on the car?
Regards
Iain
72 Sprint - 0363E
74 S130/5 - 1931L
74 S130/5 - 1931L
- sprintsoft
- Third Gear
- Posts: 225
- Joined: 18 Mar 2019
Probably someone who didn't know that there is a hole in the SIDE of the tunnel for reaching in to fit the gearbox end of the drive shaft into the gearbox.
You have to remove the right-hand seat to get at the side hole.
That rectangular hole has probably seriously weakened the chassis/subframe.
Ah, another one who didn't know about the side hole. ??
You have to remove the right-hand seat to get at the side hole.
That rectangular hole has probably seriously weakened the chassis/subframe.
pptom wrote:Having spent much time under the car, trying to insert the prop into the gearbox from the diff end, I can understand why someone a bit less patient would do this.
Ah, another one who didn't know about the side hole. ??
Bill Williams
36/6725 S3 Coupe OGU108E Yellow over Black.
36/6725 S3 Coupe OGU108E Yellow over Black.
- billwill
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 4417
- Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Poxy hole, if you can get your hand through it and reach the prop you can't drag it forward as it catches on the diff. If you push the prop past the diff first, it's in the tunnel too far to fit on the tailshaft. Maybe it was frustration at this, though it's pretty drastic.
In the end I think simply removing the diff braces gave me enough wiggle room, although an assistant would have been easier still.
Agree with Bill about weakening the spine though.
In the end I think simply removing the diff braces gave me enough wiggle room, although an assistant would have been easier still.
Agree with Bill about weakening the spine though.
- pptom
- Second Gear
- Posts: 116
- Joined: 31 May 2018
sprintsoft wrote:Hi AJ,
likely it's had a different gearbox with a shift extension in there, do you have any history on the car?
Regards
Iain
I have some parts receipts going back 2 previous owners, but no clues there.....the car has been altered in various ways over it's lifetime, so anything is possible....
1966 S3 DHC
45/6261
45/6261
-
ajwheels - Second Gear
- Posts: 65
- Joined: 06 Feb 2020
pptom wrote:Poxy hole, if you can get your hand through it and reach the prop you can't drag it forward as it catches on the diff. If you push the prop past the diff first, it's in the tunnel too far to fit on the tailshaft. Maybe it was frustration at this, though it's pretty drastic.
In the end I think simply removing the diff braces gave me enough wiggle room, although an assistant would have been easier still.
Agree with Bill about weakening the spine though.
This is what I suspect is the cause here. When I first saw the hole, my first thought was that this can't be good for chassis rigidity, my second was access to prop shaft.....
1966 S3 DHC
45/6261
45/6261
-
ajwheels - Second Gear
- Posts: 65
- Joined: 06 Feb 2020
Round holes = Good, (add lightness) c.f. Aircraft wing ribs.
Rectangular holes = BAD.
The tunnel-side hole is round which prevents excess stress at the corners and (I seem to recall) the edges of the round hole in the side are 'curled' to give extra bend resistance.
I've never had any problems using the round hole in the side to insert the front splined end of the prop-shaft. Maybe there's a knack to doing it?
I would be inclined to get a rectangular steel plate welded over that rectangular hole of yours.
Rectangular holes = BAD.
The tunnel-side hole is round which prevents excess stress at the corners and (I seem to recall) the edges of the round hole in the side are 'curled' to give extra bend resistance.
I've never had any problems using the round hole in the side to insert the front splined end of the prop-shaft. Maybe there's a knack to doing it?
I would be inclined to get a rectangular steel plate welded over that rectangular hole of yours.
Bill Williams
36/6725 S3 Coupe OGU108E Yellow over Black.
36/6725 S3 Coupe OGU108E Yellow over Black.
- billwill
- Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 4417
- Joined: 19 Apr 2008
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests