Lotus Replacement Chassis Number

PostPost by: MarkDa » Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:36 pm

I also suspect that there were far more daily drivers at the time than now.
I'm a fair weather driver now but in the 80s I used it much more as did others I know one of whom had no other car for 10 years and hill climbed his very successfully at weekends - back in the day when they wouldn't run a separate road going class and he just put low profile slicks on for racing.
MarkDa
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 1116
Joined: 15 Apr 2017

PostPost by: EPC 394J » Wed Aug 12, 2020 11:33 pm

These chassis certainly appear to have been fragile in the early days. Whether that was due to manufacture of the chassis, environmental effects or simply use, is up for discussion. Most certainly, many chassis have been replaced over the years. Some to the original manufacturer’s spec and some to a totally different aftermarket chassis design from an independent supplier.

Either way, the longevity of many ungalvanised ‘Lotus Replacement’ examples suggest it wasn’t the galvanising process of the chassis that was the key change.

Oh, and if the vehicle manufacturer calls it a chassis, that’s good enough for me! :D
Where, then, lies the answer? In choice. Which shall it be: bankruptcy of purse or bankruptcy of life?

Plus 2S

BLL 315H in white.
EPC 394J
Third Gear
Third Gear
 
Posts: 225
Joined: 07 Feb 2014

PostPost by: alan.barker » Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:03 am

Same on my 1972 Sprint Subframe (chassis) change 1985 (Lotus Galvanised not painted) still perfect.
Alan
Alan.b Brittany 1972 elan sprint fhc Lagoon Blue 0460E
alan.barker
Coveted Fifth Gear
Coveted Fifth Gear
 
Posts: 3756
Joined: 06 Dec 2008
Previous

Total Online:

Users browsing this forum: Richardsona39 and 26 guests