Page 4 of 5

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:55 pm
by stevebroad
An apology is in order. I hadn't realised that there is a recent thread on this subject. If I had known I wouldn't have started this one. Sorry chaps and chapesses.

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:07 am
by prezoom
There have been times when I thought Elan was just another one of those 4 letter words............

Rob Walker
26-4889

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:12 am
by reb53
I will re-iterate an earlier post I made on this subject.


"Baby" sounds like a smaller version of the best, or correct, one.
First came across it years ago, ( pre Interweb), in a Christopher Neil catalogue.
Took a while to figure out what the hell he was on about......

Ralph.

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:06 am
by simonknee
stevebroad wrote:An apology is in order. I hadn't realised that there is a recent thread on this subject. If I had known I wouldn't have started this one. Sorry chaps and chapesses.


Oh but then we wouldn't have had so much fun.
(It was a slow night at work yesterday)

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:15 am
by elansprint71
ardee_selby wrote:Was this Dave Brodie Elan one of his "Run Baby Run" editions?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/12078476@N07/2685483311/

Cheers - Richard


Yes that's the Brode's Baby Elan... which, as any fule kno, was the British Vita Elan, before it was downsized.

Now; about the Dadio Elite...

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:39 am
by ardee_selby
stevebroad wrote:An apology is in order. I hadn't realised that there is a recent thread on this subject. If I had known I wouldn't have started this one. Sorry chaps and chapesses.


No problem really...just another form of "Quantitative Easing" :wink:

Richard

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:39 am
by stevebroad
ardee_selby wrote:
stevebroad wrote:An apology is in order. I hadn't realised that there is a recent thread on this subject. If I had known I wouldn't have started this one. Sorry chaps and chapesses.


No problem really...just another form of "Quantitative Easing" :wink:

Richard


Ouch :-)

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:29 pm
by Lotus14S2
So is there a "Papa" and "Mama" Elan?

There is the +2 (A Mama Elan, but more likely a younger sister, as she was born after the Baby), the '80s Ford Thunderbird Elan (The fat younger and distant cousin), and the '90s M100 Elan (The illegitimate younger brother sired by General Motors). There is, of course,the KIA Elan (Stolen by Gypsies and sold to an Asian billionaire) and the MX-5 (More or less an homage to the original). Also the 2013 Elan which became the 2017 Elan (So far out on the branches of the family tree, it is hard to place).

I didn't come up with names for the 26R, Series 1 through 4, Sprint, SE, Coupe, and others. Any suggestions?

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:20 pm
by elj221c
Lotus14S2 wrote:So is there a "Papa" and "Mama" Elan

I didn't come up with names for the 26R


Clone..............................s

Did I just type that? :oops:

:wink:

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:20 pm
by Rob_LaMoreaux
I can't believe I wasted time reading all that.

I don't hate "baby Elan", but I don't think it necessary or clever. I find "just 2 Elan" clever, but cumbersome.

Call it what you like. Mine is a bright eyed ballerina and not a baby.

Rob
1969 Just 2 Elan DHC

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:54 pm
by pharriso
Lotus14S2 wrote:I didn't come up with names for the 26R, Series 1 through 4, Sprint, SE, Coupe, and others. Any suggestions?


26R = Premie Elan?.... (underweight)

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 4:09 am
by Tahoe
Since the baby is concidered the last one born then the M100 is "The Baby Elan". However, if we are only talking about the 60's and 70's versions sharing the same drivetrain then the +2 is "The Baby Elan" or should I say "Big Baby Elan" :?:

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:10 am
by stevebroad
As I have always understood the term, it refers to size rather than age and used to differentiate between the Elan and the Elan +2. I found the term very useful when talking to non Lotus experts as they tended to confuse the cars. They usually knew there were two and one was bigger than the other but often thought that the bigger car was called an Elan (with no +2 suffix) so my saying I had the baby Elan solved this problem. Worked then and works now.

Maybe 'baby' users should restrict its use to non Lotus fans so as not to upset the sensitive ones among us?

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:43 am
by ardee_selby
stevebroad wrote: As I have always understood the term, it refers to size rather than age...


Surely, when Elans have earned the "Giant Killer" epithet, it has meant exactly that...but maybe the emphasis was on the small engine capacity. Whatever...maybe a word for the opposite of giant would have been more acceptable than b*by.

(But having looked some up maybe not! :roll:)

Richard

Re: What's wrong with the term 'Baby Elan' ?

PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:12 am
by stevebroad
Nothing to do with engine capacity, as the Elan and +2 have the same basic engine, as we all know :-) It was, as still is as far as I am aware, simply a term to separate Elans from Elan+2s, especially when talking to non-Elan people. Nothing more, nothing less.

Now that my brain has had a little time to kick into life, I seem to recall the terms 'big brother' and 'bigger brother' being used by +2 owners many years ago :-)