Page 1 of 1

Aluminum bellhousing

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:01 pm
by s4elan
Can someone tell me the weight difference between the standard cast bellhousing and the aluminum one? Are there any negatives with using the aluminum?

thx,

Pete

Re: Aluminum bellhousing

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:41 pm
by elanman999
Pete,
From the TTR web site the alloy bell housing saves 4.6kg. Negatives? yes the threads strip easier!!!
Cheers
John
http://www.tonythompsonracing.co.uk/mainframe.html

Re: Aluminum bellhousing

PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:52 pm
by a1topdog
I can pick my alloy bellhousing up with 1 finger , but with my cast one I need to use a whole hand :shock:

Re: Aluminum bellhousing

PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:33 pm
by msd1107
And the magnesium bellhousing saves 5.85 kg.

Might as well go whole hog and replace the gearbox case with aluminum (8.2 kg), the differential case with aluminum/magnesium (5.75 kg), and the engine block with aluminum (about 18+ kg).

Then magnesium rear uprights, aluminum flywheel, aluminum front hubs, lightweight calipers, aluminum radiator, aluminum/magnesium wheels, lexan windows, TT lightweight body shell - the possibilities extend onward!

David
1968 36/7988

Re: Aluminum bellhousing

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:32 pm
by twincamman
wellllll its the best $450 I spent on the car - :shock: ---I just go and lift the whole tranny bell and marvel at the lack of weight of magnesium ----and its so pretty -and the helicoils prevent thread stripping -- the old bell allowed newspapers- -rocks -small dogs and old people to be sucked into the clutch area causing throw out bearing failure -- :x -ed

Re: Aluminum bellhousing

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:14 pm
by john.p.clegg
Ed
Well maybe this time you'll fit the closing plate at the bottom or the same foreign objects will continue to be hoovered up....

John :wink:

Re: Aluminum bellhousing

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:33 pm
by twincamman
good idea ---the plate and stiffener plate weighs more than the housing -- :lol: ----ed