+2 steering rack in baby elan
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Yes, I fitted a +2 rack in my S2 after changing the tie rods. (track rods)
Brian
64 S2 Roadster
72 Sprint FHC
64 S2 Roadster
72 Sprint FHC
-
types26/36 - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Hi Jim !
I asked about this a while back - see
http://www.lotuselan.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1445
There seem to be a lot of steering racks about with 'home-made' limit spacers (e.g. on eBay). The number of turns seems to vary considerably from the 'standard' spec. Just make sure you don't get an unmodified Triumph Herald one as it will turn far tooooo sharply
Best wishes,
Matthew
I asked about this a while back - see
http://www.lotuselan.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1445
There seem to be a lot of steering racks about with 'home-made' limit spacers (e.g. on eBay). The number of turns seems to vary considerably from the 'standard' spec. Just make sure you don't get an unmodified Triumph Herald one as it will turn far tooooo sharply
Best wishes,
Matthew
- ppnelan
- Fourth Gear
- Posts: 691
- Joined: 16 Sep 2003
I think some +2's were fitted with the extentsion on the tie rod and some had a longer tie rod, Dave Beans book lists a:
a 6" tie rod (Elan)
a 7" tie rod ((Europa,+2, Seven)
and also the tie rod extensions (+2)
a 6" tie rod (Elan)
a 7" tie rod ((Europa,+2, Seven)
and also the tie rod extensions (+2)
Brian
64 S2 Roadster
72 Sprint FHC
64 S2 Roadster
72 Sprint FHC
-
types26/36 - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: 11 Sep 2003
There seem to be a lot of steering racks about with 'home-made' limit spacers (e.g. on eBay). The number of turns seems to vary considerably from the 'standard' spec. Just make sure you don't get an unmodified Triumph Herald one as it will turn far tooooo sharply
Hmm, wasn't the original application the Herald/Spitfire which was then modified for the Elan purely by the addition of the travel limiting spacers and the tie rod shortening/threading? By turning far too sharply do you mean the ratio was changed as I can't say I've seen any mention of that before (and I'm sure that's what Robinshaw and Ross also say)
Martin
72 Sprint DHC
72 Sprint DHC
-
M100 - Third Gear
- Posts: 450
- Joined: 16 Sep 2003
Martin, yes!!
With
the maximum steering angle of the wheels will be reduced, so if you DON'T have these spacers fitted then the rack and therefore wheels will move too far. The tyres will contact the body or chassis/antiroll bar (maybe) with unpleasant results....
Matthew
With
M100 wrote:...the addition of the travel limiting spacers...
the maximum steering angle of the wheels will be reduced, so if you DON'T have these spacers fitted then the rack and therefore wheels will move too far. The tyres will contact the body or chassis/antiroll bar (maybe) with unpleasant results....
Matthew
- ppnelan
- Fourth Gear
- Posts: 691
- Joined: 16 Sep 2003
M100 wrote:Hmm, wasn't the original application the Herald/Spitfire which was then modified for the Elan purely by the addition of the travel limiting spacers and the tie rod shortening/threading? )
I think that is true but there was several version's of the Spitfire... Mark 1/2/3/4 and a GT6. I dont know but maybe some of these versions had different ratio's ?
Brian
64 S2 Roadster
72 Sprint FHC
64 S2 Roadster
72 Sprint FHC
-
types26/36 - Coveted Fifth Gear
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: 11 Sep 2003
I had a plough through the Moss Spitfire/Herald/GT6 parts books a few months ago and while the basic assembly looked similar there seemed to be a lot of variants available on the racks and pinions (I never checked the steering arms) indicating some design differences.
Martin
72 Sprint DHC
72 Sprint DHC
-
M100 - Third Gear
- Posts: 450
- Joined: 16 Sep 2003
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Total Online:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests